Hill v. Palmer et al

Filing 67

ORDER GRANTING # 65 Motion. Rs shall provide P's counsel at no charge copies of medical records specified by 2/21/2013.FURTHER ORD P's Response to show-cause order due by 3/24/2013; Rs reply due 30 days from service of response. FURTHER ORD P's counsel shall confer with P by telephone re status of this case within 14 days of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/6/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 CHARLES H. HILL, 8 Petitioner, 9 3:11-cv-00048-LRH-VPC ORDER vs. 10 11 12 JACK PALMER, et al., Respondents. 13 14 This represented habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on a motion 15 (#65) for relief from payment of copying costs for petitioner’s institutional medical records. The motion 16 is unopposed to the extent of the relief granted herein. 17 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (#65) is GRANTED, such that, within 18 fourteen (14) days of entry of this order, respondents shall provide petitioner’s counsel at no charge 19 the copies of the medical records requested from the state corrections department. 20 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s time to respond to the show-cause order is 21 extended to forty-five (45) days after entry of this order, with respondents having thirty (30) days from 22 service of the response within which to file a reply. 23 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED, following upon petitioner’s proper person inquiry (#64), that 24 petitioner’s counsel shall confer with petitioner by telephone within fourteen (14 days) of entry of this 25 order as to the status of the case. The Court has no information regarding his specific inquiry in #64. 26 DATED this 6th day of February, 2013. 27 28 ____________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?