Weber v. Cortez Masto

Filing 12

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that if necessary, petitioner shall file and serve an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before October 7, 2011. Respondents shall have 60 days following service of the amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 60 days following the due-date for the amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the o riginal petition. Petitioner shall have 45 days following service of an answer to file and serve a reply. Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of a reply to file and serve a response to the reply. If respondent s file a motion to dismiss, petitioner shall have 30 days following service of the motion to file and serve an opposition. Respondents shall then have 30 days following service of the opposition to file and serve a reply. Petitioner s hall move the court should he wish for leave to conduct discovery and/or evidentiary hearing. Status conferences, and/or the filing of status reports may be scheduled periodically throughout the progression of this action. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 TIMMY JOHN WEBER, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 3:11-cv-0104-PMP-RAM E.K. McDANIEL, et al., ORDER 12 13 Respondents. _______________________________/ 14 15 16 This order is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Local Rule 16-1. 17 On June 27, 2011, the court held a status conference in this action. Counsel for petitioner 18 and counsel for respondents appeared at the conference. At the conference, counsel addressed the 19 anticipated course of proceedings in this action. 20 IT IS ORDERED: 21 1. Amended Petition. If necessary, petitioner shall file and serve an amended petition 22 for a writ of habeas corpus on or before October 7, 2011. The amended petition shall contain all 23 known grounds for relief, both exhausted and unexhausted. The amended petition shall specifically 24 state whether each ground for relief has been exhausted in state court; for each claim that has been 25 exhausted in state court, the amended petition shall state how, when, and where that occurred. 26 /// 1 If petitioner determines that an amended petition need not be filed, then, when the amended petition 2 is due, petitioner shall file and serve a statement to that effect. 3 2. Response to Petition. Respondents shall have 60 days following service of the 4 amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition. If petitioner 5 does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 60 days following the due-date for the 6 amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the original petition. 7 3. Reply and Response to Reply. Petitioner shall have 45 days following service of 8 an answer to file and serve a reply. Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of a 9 reply to file and serve a response to the reply. 10 4. Briefing of Motion to Dismiss. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, petitioner 11 shall have 30 days following service of the motion to file and serve an opposition to the motion. 12 Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of the opposition to file and serve a 13 reply. 14 5. Discovery. If petitioner wishes to move for leave to conduct discovery, petitioner 15 shall file and serve such motion concurrently with, but separate from, the response to respondents’ 16 motion to dismiss or the reply to respondents’ answer. Any motion for leave to conduct discovery 17 filed by petitioner before that time may be considered premature, and may be denied, without 18 prejudice, on that basis. Respondents shall file and serve a response to any such motion 19 concurrently with, but separate from, their reply in support of their motion to dismiss or their 20 response to petitioner’s reply. Thereafter, petitioner shall have 20 days to file and serve a reply in 21 support of the motion for leave to conduct discovery. If the court grants petitioner leave to conduct 22 discovery, the court will then establish time limits for the completion of the authorized discovery. 23 6. Evidentiary Hearing. If petitioner wishes to request an evidentiary hearing, 24 petitioner shall file and serve a motion for an evidentiary hearing concurrently with, but separate 25 from, the response to respondents’ motion to dismiss or the reply to respondents’ answer. Any 26 motion for an evidentiary hearing filed by petitioner before that time may be considered premature, 2 1 and may be denied, without prejudice, on that basis. The motion for an evidentiary hearing must 2 specifically address why an evidentiary hearing is required, and must meet the requirements of 3 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e). The motion must state whether an evidentiary hearing was held in state court, 4 and, if so, state where the transcript is located in the record. If petitioner files a motion for an 5 evidentiary hearing, respondents shall file and serve a response to that motion concurrently with, but 6 separate from, their reply in support of their motion to dismiss or their response to petitioner’s reply. 7 Thereafter, petitioner shall have 20 days to file and serve a reply in support of the motion for an 8 evidentiary hearing. 9 7. Status Reports and Status Conferences. The court may from time to time, as the 10 need arises, schedule status conferences, and/or require the filing and service of status reports, in 11 order to manage the progress of this action. 12 13 Dated this 27th day of June, 2011. 14 15 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?