Weber v. Cortez Masto
Filing
12
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that if necessary, petitioner shall file and serve an amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus on or before October 7, 2011. Respondents shall have 60 days following service of the amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 60 days following the due-date for the amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the o riginal petition. Petitioner shall have 45 days following service of an answer to file and serve a reply. Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of a reply to file and serve a response to the reply. If respondent s file a motion to dismiss, petitioner shall have 30 days following service of the motion to file and serve an opposition. Respondents shall then have 30 days following service of the opposition to file and serve a reply. Petitioner s hall move the court should he wish for leave to conduct discovery and/or evidentiary hearing. Status conferences, and/or the filing of status reports may be scheduled periodically throughout the progression of this action. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 6/27/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
TIMMY JOHN WEBER,
9
Petitioner,
10
vs.
11
3:11-cv-0104-PMP-RAM
E.K. McDANIEL, et al.,
ORDER
12
13
Respondents.
_______________________________/
14
15
16
This order is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and Local Rule 16-1.
17
On June 27, 2011, the court held a status conference in this action. Counsel for petitioner
18
and counsel for respondents appeared at the conference. At the conference, counsel addressed the
19
anticipated course of proceedings in this action.
20
IT IS ORDERED:
21
1.
Amended Petition. If necessary, petitioner shall file and serve an amended petition
22
for a writ of habeas corpus on or before October 7, 2011. The amended petition shall contain all
23
known grounds for relief, both exhausted and unexhausted. The amended petition shall specifically
24
state whether each ground for relief has been exhausted in state court; for each claim that has been
25
exhausted in state court, the amended petition shall state how, when, and where that occurred.
26
///
1
If petitioner determines that an amended petition need not be filed, then, when the amended petition
2
is due, petitioner shall file and serve a statement to that effect.
3
2.
Response to Petition. Respondents shall have 60 days following service of the
4
amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the amended petition. If petitioner
5
does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 60 days following the due-date for the
6
amended petition to file and serve an answer or other response to the original petition.
7
3.
Reply and Response to Reply. Petitioner shall have 45 days following service of
8
an answer to file and serve a reply. Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of a
9
reply to file and serve a response to the reply.
10
4.
Briefing of Motion to Dismiss. If respondents file a motion to dismiss, petitioner
11
shall have 30 days following service of the motion to file and serve an opposition to the motion.
12
Respondents shall thereafter have 30 days following service of the opposition to file and serve a
13
reply.
14
5.
Discovery. If petitioner wishes to move for leave to conduct discovery, petitioner
15
shall file and serve such motion concurrently with, but separate from, the response to respondents’
16
motion to dismiss or the reply to respondents’ answer. Any motion for leave to conduct discovery
17
filed by petitioner before that time may be considered premature, and may be denied, without
18
prejudice, on that basis. Respondents shall file and serve a response to any such motion
19
concurrently with, but separate from, their reply in support of their motion to dismiss or their
20
response to petitioner’s reply. Thereafter, petitioner shall have 20 days to file and serve a reply in
21
support of the motion for leave to conduct discovery. If the court grants petitioner leave to conduct
22
discovery, the court will then establish time limits for the completion of the authorized discovery.
23
6.
Evidentiary Hearing. If petitioner wishes to request an evidentiary hearing,
24
petitioner shall file and serve a motion for an evidentiary hearing concurrently with, but separate
25
from, the response to respondents’ motion to dismiss or the reply to respondents’ answer. Any
26
motion for an evidentiary hearing filed by petitioner before that time may be considered premature,
2
1
and may be denied, without prejudice, on that basis. The motion for an evidentiary hearing must
2
specifically address why an evidentiary hearing is required, and must meet the requirements of
3
28 U.S.C. § 2254(e). The motion must state whether an evidentiary hearing was held in state court,
4
and, if so, state where the transcript is located in the record. If petitioner files a motion for an
5
evidentiary hearing, respondents shall file and serve a response to that motion concurrently with, but
6
separate from, their reply in support of their motion to dismiss or their response to petitioner’s reply.
7
Thereafter, petitioner shall have 20 days to file and serve a reply in support of the motion for an
8
evidentiary hearing.
9
7.
Status Reports and Status Conferences. The court may from time to time, as the
10
need arises, schedule status conferences, and/or require the filing and service of status reports, in
11
order to manage the progress of this action.
12
13
Dated this 27th day of June, 2011.
14
15
______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?