Byford v. Nevada Attorney General et al

Filing 149

ORDER - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 148 ) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including September 26, 2022, to file their answer (Re: ECF No. 92 , 9/26/2022). Petitio ner will then have 180 days to file his reply. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered October 24, 2019 (ECF No. 88 ) will remain in effect. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJD)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-cv-00112-JCM-CSD Document 149 Filed 08/25/22 Page 1 of 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 ROBERT ROYCE BYFORD, Petitioner, 6 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (ECF NO. 148) v. 7 8 Case No. 3:11-cv-00112-JCM-CSD WILLIAM REUBART, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 12 In this capital habeas corpus action, after a 180-day initial period, a 90-day 13 extension of time, and two 45-day extensions of time, Respondents had until 14 August 22, 2022, to file an answer, responding to the remaining claims in Petitioner 15 Robert Royce Byford’s third amended habeas petition. See Order entered August 27, 16 2021 (ECF No. 135) (180 days for answer); Order entered March 1, 2022 (ECF No. 17 140) (90-day extension); Order entered May 27, 2022 (ECF No. 143) (45-day 18 extension); Order entered July 15, 2022 (ECF No. 146) (45-day extension). 19 On August 19, 2022, Respondents filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 20 148), requesting a further 35-day extension of time, to September 26, 2022. 21 Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of her 22 obligations in other cases. Petitioner does not oppose the motion for extension of time. 23 The Court finds that Respondents’ motion for extension of time is made in good 24 faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the 25 extension of time requested. 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 Case 3:11-cv-00112-JCM-CSD Document 149 Filed 08/25/22 Page 2 of 2 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of 2 Time (ECF No. 148) is GRANTED. Respondents will have until and including 3 September 26, 2022, to file their answer. Petitioner will then have 180 days to file his 4 reply. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order 5 entered October 24, 2019 (ECF No. 88) will remain in effect. 6 7 DATED August 25, 2022. 8 9 10 JAMES C. MAHAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?