Byford v. Nevada Attorney General et al

Filing 88

ORDER granting ECF No. 85 Petitioner's Renewed Motion to Vacate Stay and Reopen Habeas Corpus Proceeding; the stay of this action is lifted; the schedule listed herein will govern the further proceedings in this action. See order pdf for further details and instructions. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 5 ROBERT ROYCE BYFORD, Case No. 3:11-cv-00112-JCM-WGC Petitioner, v. 6 ORDER GRANTING RENEWED MOTION TO VACATE STAY AND REOPEN HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDING (ECF NO. 85) 7 8 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., Respondents. 9 10 11 12 In this capital habeas corpus action, on February 1, 2013, the Court granted a 13 motion filed by the petitioner, Robert Royce Byford, requesting that the action be stayed 14 pending his further state-court litigation. See Order entered February 1, 2013 (ECF No. 15 53). On March 13, 2017, the Court granted Byford’s motion to temporarily lift the stay to 16 allow him to add to his petition in this action a new claim, one based on Hurst v. Florida, 17 136 S.Ct. 616 (2016). See Order entered March 13, 2017 (ECF No. 73). In all other 18 respects the stay remained in place following the March 13, 2017, order. See id. 19 On August 13, 2019, Byford filed a motion to lift the stay (ECF No. 81), but the Court 20 determined that, at that time, the state-court proceeding had not been completed, and 21 the Court denied that motion. See Order entered September 10, 2019 (ECF No. 84). 22 On October 9, 2019, Byford filed a renewed motion to lift the stay (ECF No. 85), 23 stating that his state-court proceedings have now been concluded. On October 22, 24 2019, the respondents filed a response to that motion (ECF No. 87) stating that they do 25 not oppose the motion. The Court will grant Byford’s motion to lift the stay and will set a 26 schedule for further proceedings in this action. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Renewed Motion to Vacate Stay 2 and Reopen Habeas Corpus Proceeding (ECF No. 85) is GRANTED. The stay of this 3 action is lifted. 4 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following schedule will govern the further proceedings in this action: 1. Amended Petition. Petitioner will have 60 days from the date of this order 7 to file a third amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. The third amended petition 8 must specifically state whether each ground for relief has been exhausted in state court; 9 for each claim that has been exhausted in state court, the third amended petition must 10 11 state how, when, and where that occurred. 2. Response to Petition. Respondents will have 90 days following the filing 12 of the third amended petition to file an answer or other response to the third amended 13 petition. 14 3. Reply and Response to Reply. Petitioner will have 45 days following the 15 filing of an answer to file a reply. Respondents will thereafter have 30 days following the 16 filing of a reply to file a response to the reply. 17 4. Briefing of Motion to Dismiss. If Respondents file a motion to dismiss, 18 Petitioner will have 60 days following the filing of the motion to file a response to the 19 motion. Respondents will thereafter have 30 days following the filing of the response to 20 file a reply. 21 5. Discovery. If Petitioner wishes to move for leave to conduct discovery, 22 Petitioner must file such motion concurrently with, but separate from, the response to 23 Respondents’ motion to dismiss or the reply to Respondents’ answer. Any motion for 24 leave to conduct discovery filed by Petitioner before that time may be considered 25 premature, and may be denied, without prejudice, on that basis. Respondents must file 26 a response to any such motion concurrently with, but separate from, their reply in 27 support of their motion to dismiss or their response to Petitioner’s reply. Thereafter, 28 2 1 Petitioner will have 20 days to file a reply in support of the motion for leave to conduct 2 discovery. 3 6. Evidentiary Hearing. If Petitioner wishes to request an evidentiary 4 hearing, Petitioner must file a motion for an evidentiary hearing concurrently with, but 5 separate from, the response to Respondents’ motion to dismiss or the reply to 6 Respondents’ answer. Any motion for an evidentiary hearing filed by Petitioner before 7 that time may be considered premature, and may be denied, without prejudice, on that 8 basis. The motion for an evidentiary hearing must specifically address why an 9 evidentiary hearing is required and must meet the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(e). 10 The motion must state whether an evidentiary hearing was held in state court, and, if so, 11 where the transcript is located in the record. If Petitioner files a motion for an evidentiary 12 hearing, Respondents must file a response to that motion concurrently with, but 13 separate from, their reply in support of their motion to dismiss or their response to 14 Petitioner’s reply. Thereafter, Petitioner will have 20 days to file a reply in support of the 15 motion for an evidentiary hearing. 16 17 DATED October 24, 2019. THIS ___ day of ______________________, 2019. 18 19 20 JAMES C. MAHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?