Koerner v. Cox et al

Filing 98

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 6/27/2013, DENYING Plaintiff's 91 , 92 , and 95 Motions. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
KELLY KOERNER,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES GREG COX, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
PRESENT:

3:11-CV-0116-LRH (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff’s third motion for recusal of magistrate judge (#92) is DENIED for the same
reasons set forth in the court’s prior orders (#s 80 & 90). Furthermore, plaintiff’s motions for
contracts for mediation and ombudsman programs (#91) and for evidentiary hearing (#95) are
DENIED.
The court further notes that the proper way to challenge a magistrate judge’s decision is
to file an objection pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-1 rather than repeatedly filing the same motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk