Nichols v. Astrue

Filing 19

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the 18 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Defendant's 9 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 ***** 9 10 11 12 13 DERRICK NICHOLS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00124-LRH-VPC ORDER 14 15 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. 16 Cooke (#181 ) entered on March 1, 2012, recommending granting Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (#9) 17 filed on July 1, 2011. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was 18 referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the 19 Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. 20 The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and 21 memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) 22 and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 23 (#18) entered on March 1, 2012, should be adopted and accepted. 24 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#18) 25 26 1 Refers to court’s docket number. 1 entered on March 1, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (#9) is 2 GRANTED. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED this 28th day of March, 2012. 6 7 8 _______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?