Knight v. Climbing Magazine et al

Filing 49

ORDERED that D's # 42 Motion to strike is GRANTED. The clerk of court shall STRIKE P's # 41 Notice to the court. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 9 BRIAN KNIGHT, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 CLIMBING MAGAZINE; et al., 13 Defendants. 3:11-CV-0146-LRH-RAM ORDER 14 15 16 Before the court is defendant Skram Media, LLC’s (“Skram Media”) motion to strike plaintiff Brian Knight’s notice to the court (Doc. #411). Doc. #42. 17 On December 23, 2010, Knight filed a complaint against defendants for libel and intentional 18 infliction of emotional distress in state court. Doc. #1, Exhibit A. Defendants removed the action to 19 federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Doc. #1. In response, Knight filed a notice to the 20 court concerning removal. Doc. #41. Thereafter, Skram filed the present motion to strike Knight’s 21 notice. Doc. #42. 22 Pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may strike a filing 23 for “any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” FED . R. CIV . P. 12(f). In its 24 motion, Skram argues that the notice to the court is an impertinent filing because it was filed 25 26 1 Refers to the court’s docketing number. 1 without leave of court. See Doc. #42. The court agrees. The notice to the court is without basis or 2 factual or legal support and shall be stricken from the record. Accordingly, the court shall grant 3 Skram’s motion to strike. 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. #42) is 6 GRANTED. The clerk of court shall STRIKE plaintiff’s notice to the court (Doc. #41). 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 DATED this 19th day of December, 2011. 9 10 __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?