Knight v. Climbing Magazine et al
Filing
49
ORDERED that D's # 42 Motion to strike is GRANTED. The clerk of court shall STRIKE P's # 41 Notice to the court. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
BRIAN KNIGHT,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
CLIMBING MAGAZINE; et al.,
13
Defendants.
3:11-CV-0146-LRH-RAM
ORDER
14
15
16
Before the court is defendant Skram Media, LLC’s (“Skram Media”) motion to strike
plaintiff Brian Knight’s notice to the court (Doc. #411). Doc. #42.
17
On December 23, 2010, Knight filed a complaint against defendants for libel and intentional
18
infliction of emotional distress in state court. Doc. #1, Exhibit A. Defendants removed the action to
19
federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. Doc. #1. In response, Knight filed a notice to the
20
court concerning removal. Doc. #41. Thereafter, Skram filed the present motion to strike Knight’s
21
notice. Doc. #42.
22
Pursuant to Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court may strike a filing
23
for “any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter.” FED . R. CIV . P. 12(f). In its
24
motion, Skram argues that the notice to the court is an impertinent filing because it was filed
25
26
1
Refers to the court’s docketing number.
1
without leave of court. See Doc. #42. The court agrees. The notice to the court is without basis or
2
factual or legal support and shall be stricken from the record. Accordingly, the court shall grant
3
Skram’s motion to strike.
4
5
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to strike (Doc. #42) is
6
GRANTED. The clerk of court shall STRIKE plaintiff’s notice to the court (Doc. #41).
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
DATED this 19th day of December, 2011.
9
10
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?