Wiideman v. State Of Nevada et al

Filing 14

ORDER DENYING 12 Motion to amend Screening Order. FURTHER ORD Second Amended Complaint due by 7/23/2011. FURTHER ORD P shall title complaint as "SECOND AMENDED" w case number above. FURTHER ORD Clerk shall send P 1983 from w instruction s, 1 cpy of # 9 original complaint, the # 10 first amended complaint, as well as copies of orders #s 8 , 11 , and 13 . ( Form and docs mailed to P 6/23/2011. ) FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of this court's # 11 Screening Order directin g Ds to file a response to the first amended complaint within 30 days is VACATED. Ds need not file a response until further order of this court. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 6/23/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 RANDAL N. WIIDEMAN, #22306 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 STATE OF NEVADA, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 3:11-cv-00155-ECR-RAM ORDER 16 17 This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court issued 18 an Order dated May 26, 2011 (docket #11) that dismissed some claims and allowed some claims to 19 proceed. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend Screening Order (docket #12). Plaintiff, who 20 has filed several duplicative actions before this court, seeks to raise claims here that he has been directed 21 to raise in 3:11-cv-00174-ECR-RAM. Plaintiff, however, has been granted leave to file an amended 22 complaint in 3:11-cv-00174-ECR-RAM (see docket #12 in that case), and he is advised to comply with 23 the court’s Orders to set forth any and all access to courts claims in 3:11-cv-00174-ECR-RAM. 24 The court also notes that another case filed by plaintiff, 3:11-cv-00119-RCJ-RAM, was 25 dismissed as duplicative of this action, and the court directed plaintiff to seek leave to file an amended 26 complaint in this action if he wished to set forth additional allegations related to the twenty-page limit 1 on incoming mail as well as regulations regarding receipt of outside legal publications and other legal 2 materials. 3 Because the above-described events occurred close in time, and in the interest of judicial 4 economy, the court will give plaintiff the opportunity to file a second amended complaint, if necessary, 5 to set forth all claims that he has been directed to bring in this action. Plaintiff is advised to review the 6 Screening Orders in this case (docket #s 8, 11) as well as the orders discussed above. If for any reason 7 plaintiff omitted any claims in his first amended complaint, he has leave to file a second amended 8 complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date this Order is entered to file a second 9 amended complaint. If plaintiff elects not to file a second amended complaint, this action will proceed 10 11 12 according to the Screening Order dated May 26, 2011 (docket #11). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to amend Screening Order (docket #12) is DENIED. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has thirty (30) days from the date that this 14 Order is entered to file his second amended complaint, if any. The second amended complaint must be 15 a complete document in and of itself, and will supersede the original complaint in its entirety. Any 16 allegations, parties, or requests for relief from prior papers that are not carried forward in the second 17 amended complaint will no longer be before the court. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall clearly title the amended complaint 19 as such by placing the words “SECOND AMENDED” immediately above “Civil Rights Complaint 20 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983” on page 1 in the caption, and plaintiff shall place the case number, 3:11- 21 CV-00155-ECR-RAM, above the words “SECOND AMENDED”in the space for “Case No.” 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff is expressly cautioned that if he does not 23 timely file a second amended complaint in compliance with this Order, this action shall proceed in 24 accordance with the Screening Order dated May 26, 2011 (docket #11). 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send to plaintiff a blank section 1983 26 civil rights complaint form with instructions along with one copy of the original complaint (docket #9), 2 1 the first amended complaint (docket #10) as well as one copy of each of the following orders: 2 docket #s 8, 11, and 13. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the portion of this court’s Screening Order dated 4 May 26, 2011 (docket #11) directing defendants to file a response to the first amended complaint within 5 thirty days is VACATED. Defendants need not file a response until further order of this court. 6 7 8 DATED this 23rd day of June 2011. 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?