Morse v. Smith et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/25/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)

Download PDF
' . ( - - - - - - F! ) lEt EN ERED . k ( l() : E' 1E),'i ' S? . 11 AVE )$ D ' . :)JI E.ftIl F0!PE I' ft 2 i 'i' J ' CIF , / ? 1f . P l 2 VAI 2 b 2 1 : I g1 S E,' !SR: t'k LFkJ . : !Tl.' ! s' , ! lT: '' t . 3 4 5 8 : C:1ft 'CfSf' : :L' 5 ' 'XSA . ,'' . liv t z:u'f ,i ' . 6 7 8 9 UNI TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT DISTRICT O F N EVAD A 1 ROBERT W ADE M ORSE, 0 11 1 vs 2 . Pli if antf, 1 GREGORY SMI e aI, 3 TH, t . 1 4 15 De e a s f nd nt. / . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3: - v 0015 RCJ11 c - 8VPC ORDER 16 Thi i an acton i tat by Rober W ade M or e,a Nevada sat prs ,who has ss i nii ed t s t e ioner I7 s it apetton f wrtofhabeascor w ihoutpayi t flng f ors itng an applcaton ubm ted ii or i pus t ng he ii ee ubm ti i i -VPC Morse v. Smith et al l t pr e d l for pa pe i. ( No.l. Ad tonal p ii rnots t thi peii i 8 o oc e ' ma u rs ECF n ) dii ly, ettone e ha s tton s Doc. 3 l tsu cesve' Thepeii s lbedimis wihou prj c a dic sdbeow. 9 t c si . ' tton hal s sed t t eudie s suse l 20 A pettonerseeki r i fom t sCourton alegatonst bi st e cour convi i ii ng elef r hi l i hat s at t cton 21 ors nt c vi a ef de a l w , us tr tpa t e r quie $5 fln f eoro ai I a oft Cour t e en e ol t e r l a m t i s y h e r d ii g e bt n e ve he to 22 poc e i r pau rs 28U. C.j1 5.Peii rha f ldt me tt srquie nta s c r e d nfo ma pe i. S. 9l ttone s aie o e hi e rme nd u h 23 iavai ba it dimist pettonwihout r'u c Howe ramor sgniia bai frdimis l s ld sso s s he ii t pe die. j ve, e i fc nt ss o s sa 24 i tefc t tt peii i,onisfc ,i vi ainof28U. C.j 4( ,i t ti i asc o s h a tha he tton s t a e n olto S. 224 b) n ha t s e ond r 25 s uccessve petton and pettonerhasnotobt ned l i ii ii ai eave oft CourtofAppeal t pr he s o oceed. 26 l Dockets.Justia.com i . ! ' : ' . k ( l ' Un rAEDPA' ne g c e pi ' ovi i ns an applcants ng t f l a s de S w s at k e ng'pr s o , i eeki o ie econd or 2 s ucces ve petton m us obt n f om t appr i e cour ofappeal an or aut i ng t di rct si ii t ai r he oprat t s der horzi he sti 3 cour t consdert applcaton. 28U. C. 22 b)3)A) Se to 2 4( () ovi st t cl m to i he i i S. j 44( ( ( . cin 24 b)2 pr de ha a ai ' j ! 4 pr s nt d i as c ors c s i ha a co usa i a i un rs c i 225 t t a not es nt d e e e n e ond uc e sve be s p pplc ton de e ton 4 ha w s pr e e ' i : 5 i aprorapplcaton s l di i ed unl spettonercanpr n i i i hal be sm ss es ii esentan Or oft N i h Cicui Court der he nt r t E ! : 6 ofAppe l gr ntng I a t pr ce d. a s a i e ve o o e 7 . . A cour ofappeal ent ssuch an or onl upon a show i t : t s er der y ng hat 2 8 9 ( t a ia s wst tt cam r ison ane r e o c tt ton 1w m a e A) he pplc nt ho ha he li ele w ul f onsiu i al a d r r i t cases on colat alr ew by t Supr e Court t was pr ousl et oactvc o l cr evi he cm , hat evi y unavaiabl or l e; l 0 11 ( () t f t pr dia e f t cli co d not'a be ndic r d B)1 he acual e c t or he am ul h ve e s ove e pr ousl t ough t exer s ofduc dii evi y hr he cie lgence'and , 1 2 l3 E (i t fct un ri t cli ,i pr n a viwe i t lghtoft i) he a s de lng he am f ove nd e d n he i he e d e a a whol,woul be s tcint t e t bls b cla a vienc s e d ufi e d sa ih y e r nd convi ng evi nci dencet ,butf constm tonaler or no r onabl f hat or i i r , eas e act Gnderwoul ha f d ve ound t applcantguit oft underyi of ense. he i ly be l ng f ' 5 I 1 28U. C. 2 b)2)A)( . 4 S. j 244( ( ( -B) 1 5 Petton ra kn c e t th ha notobti d la oft c ' t pr e d See ii e c owldg s ha e s ane e ve he oul o oc e t . ; ( ! 16 Petton, p.2,iem 6. Thus,t petton m us be di i ed and pettonerm us subm i an applcaton ii t he ii t sm ss ii t t i i 17 t t N i h Cicui Cour ofAppeal bef e pr o he nt r t t s or oceedi wih t s petton i t sCour. ng t hi ii n hi t l 8 20 21 ! I I THEREFORE ORDERED t tt saci i DI I T S ha hi ton s SM SSED wihoutprj di . t eu ce l TheClr s ale e j me a c digl 9 ek h l ntr udg nt c or n y. Dat t s 25t day ofM ar 2011. ed hi h ch, 22 E 23 . i I l ! j . 24 25 . I TED STA JNI S DI STRI JUD GE CT ' ' 26 g '

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?