Hicks v. Roger et al

Filing 11

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the 7 , 8 , 9 , and 10 Notices are STRICKEN. FURTH ORD that P shall file no more documents in this closed case. Any such documents shall be returned, unfiled, to P. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 ROBERT E. HICKS, #96457 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 DAVID ROGER, et al., 15 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 3:11-cv-00185-HDM-RAM ORDER 16 17 On March 18, 2011, this court dismissed this action, which plaintiff styled as a prisoner 18 civil rights action, as delusional and factually frivolous (docket #5), and judgment was entered (docket 19 #6). Since that time, plaintiff has filed several documents styled as “notices” that are similarly 20 delusional and factually frivolous (docket #s 7, 8, 9, 10). Moreover, this case is closed. Plaintiff shall 21 file no further documents in this closed case. Any such documents shall be returned, unfiled, to plaintiff. 22 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the following documents entitled “Notice” filed 23 24 25 26 by plaintiff: docket #s 7, 8, 9, 10 are STRICKEN. 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file no more documents in this closed case. Any such documents shall be returned, unfiled, to plaintiff. DATED this 22nd day of August, 2011. 4 5 6 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?