Depasquale v. State of Nevada, ex rel. NDOC et al
Filing
50
ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING 35 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 30 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
VINCENT DEPASQUALE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC
O RDER
14
15
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb
16
(#351 ) entered on April 27, 2012, recommending denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#30)
17
filed on February 17, 2012. No objections were filed to the Report and Recommendation. This action was
18
referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of
19
Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
20
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and
21
memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and
22
Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#35)
23
entered on April 27, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.
24
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#35)
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
entered on April 27, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#30) is
2
DENIED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED this 6th day of July, 2012.
6
7
8
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?