Depasquale v. State of Nevada, ex rel. NDOC et al
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING Magistrate Judge's 77 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING Defendants' 67 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 06/29/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
VINCENT DEPASQUALE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00191-LRH-WGC
ORDER
14
15
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G.
16
Cobb (#771) entered on May 23, 2013, recommending granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary
17
Judgment (#67) filed on December 7, 2012. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been
18
filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local
19
Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
20
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and
21
memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B)
22
and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
23
(#77) entered on May 23, 2013, should be adopted and accepted.
24
///
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#77)
2
entered on May 23, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment
3
(#67) is GRANTED.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED this 29th day of June, 2013.
7
8
9
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?