Munoz v. Smith et al

Filing 73

ORDER re 69 First Amended Petition. Respondents' answer due within 45 days. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 PETER J. MUNOZ, JR., 10 Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 Case No. 3:11-cv-00197-LRH-RAM GREGORY SMITH, WARDEN, et al., 13 ORDER Respondents. 14 15 Petitioner has filed a first amended petition (#69). The court has reviewed it pursuant to 16 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court 17 will direct respondents to file a response. 18 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the 19 date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition (#69). 20 Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, 21 including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be 22 entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the 23 Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall 24 have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply. 25 DATED this 2nd day of June, 2015. 26 27 28 _________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?