Munoz v. Smith et al
Filing
73
ORDER re 69 First Amended Petition. Respondents' answer due within 45 days. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/2/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
PETER J. MUNOZ, JR.,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
Case No. 3:11-cv-00197-LRH-RAM
GREGORY SMITH, WARDEN, et al.,
13
ORDER
Respondents.
14
15
Petitioner has filed a first amended petition (#69). The court has reviewed it pursuant to
16
Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. The court
17
will direct respondents to file a response.
18
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the
19
date of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the amended petition (#69).
20
Respondents shall raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading,
21
including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be
22
entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the
23
Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall
24
have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
25
DATED this 2nd day of June, 2015.
26
27
28
_________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?