Flores v. State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 18

ORDERED P's # 15 motion for extension of time is GRANTED in part. P's requests for discovery (#s 15 & 16 ) are DENIED. P shall have one final extension of time to Friday, September 9, 2011 to file an opposition to Ds' # 12 Motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SAMUEL FLORES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) E.K. McDANIEL, ) ) Defendant. ) ______________________________) PRESENT: 3:11-CV-0236-HDM (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT August 22, 2011 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (#15) is GRANTED in part. Plaintiff’s requests for discovery (#s 15 & 16) are DENIED. Plaintiff shall have one final extension of time to Friday, September 9, 2011 to file an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time shall be granted. If plaintiff fails to timely file an opposition, defendants’ motion will be submitted to the court as an unopposed motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?