Camacho v. McDaniel et al

Filing 60

ORDERED that respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 56 ) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 58 and 59 ) are both GRANTED. Petitioner shall file the reply on or before July 28, 2017. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

EDUARDO CAMACHO,

10

Case No. 3:11-cv-00318-LRH-WGC
Petitioner, ORDER

v.
11
E.K. MCDANIEL, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
15
16
17

This counseled 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas matter is before the court on motions
for extension of time by both parties. Good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time to file an answer
to the petition (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.

18

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s first and second motions for

19

extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 58 and 59) are both

20

GRANTED. Petitioner shall file the reply on or before July 28, 2017.

21

DATED this 5th day of June, 2017.

22
23

LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1