Mizzoni v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
22
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 1/18/2012. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 17 Motion is DENIED. Plaintiff is advised to follow NDOC procedures for allowable copy work. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KO)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOSEPH L. MIZZONI,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00358-HDM-WGC
MINUTE ORDER
January 18, 2012
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
JENNIFER COTTER
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s Motion for Copy Work Extension (Doc. #17). On
December 30, 2011, defendants opposed plaintiff’s motion (Doc. #19). No reply memorandum
was timely filed.
Plaintiff states he has reached his limit of $100 for allotted copy work. Plaintiff wants the
court to authorize “another $100 limit of copy work.” (Doc. # 17 at 3.) The defendants oppose
the request. (Doc. #19.) Defendants note that when an inmate has sufficient funds on deposit in
the inmate’s trust account, the inmate must sign a “brass slip to pay back their copy work debt.
(Exhibit B at 3).” (Doc. # 19 at 2.)
Defendants submit documentation that plaintiff has $241.80 in his NDOC Trust II
account (Id., citing defendants’ Exhibit C at 2, 4.) As such, defendants refute plaintiff’s clam he
cannot make additional copies as plaintiff
“simply needs to fill out a brass slip paying off his copy work debt with funds
he has in his NDOC Trust II Account (citation omitted.) He will then be
allowed to accrue another $100 in legal copy work debt . . .” (Doc. # 17) Id.
Plaintiff should follow NDOC procedures for allowable copy work. Plaintiff’s
Motion (Doc. # 17) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?