Hook v. Ugalde et al

Filing 59

ORDER. A hearing on the motion to remand is scheduled for 11/9/2011 at 10:30 a.m. All remaining defendants who have been served with the summons/complaint shall have ten (10) days in which to join in removal or respond to the motion to remand. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Order for specifics). (Notice of Compliance is due by 10/28/2011.) Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 19 BRENDA C. HOOK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CHESTER UGALDE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00364-HDM-VPC ORDER 20 This action was removed to federal court on May 20, 2011, by 21 defendant Cessna Aircraft Company. Defendant Continental Motors, 22 Inc., formerly known as and incorrectly sued as Teledyne 23 Continental Motors, filed a supplemental notice of jurisdiction on 24 June 6, 2011. Plaintiff filed a motion to remand (#19) on June 17, 25 2011. Both Cessna Aircraft Company and Continental Motors, Inc. 26 opposed the motion to remand. No other defendants have joined in 27 removal or responded to the motion to remand. 28 1 A hearing on the 1 2 motion to remand is scheduled for November 9, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. On September 8, 2011, defendant Cessna Aircraft Company was 3 dismissed without prejudice through a stipulation. 4 2011, defendant Continental Motors, Inc. was dismissed without 5 prejudice through a stipulation. On October 13, 6 All remaining defendants who have been served with the summons 7 and complaint in this action shall have ten (10) days from the date 8 of this order in which to join in removal or respond to the motion 9 to remand. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 DATED: This 18th day of October, 2011. 12 13 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?