Hook v. Ugalde et al
Filing
59
ORDER. A hearing on the motion to remand is scheduled for 11/9/2011 at 10:30 a.m. All remaining defendants who have been served with the summons/complaint shall have ten (10) days in which to join in removal or respond to the motion to remand. IT IS SO ORDERED. (See Order for specifics). (Notice of Compliance is due by 10/28/2011.) Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
16
17
18
19
BRENDA C. HOOK,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CHESTER UGALDE, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00364-HDM-VPC
ORDER
20
This action was removed to federal court on May 20, 2011, by
21
defendant Cessna Aircraft Company.
Defendant Continental Motors,
22
Inc., formerly known as and incorrectly sued as Teledyne
23
Continental Motors, filed a supplemental notice of jurisdiction on
24
June 6, 2011.
Plaintiff filed a motion to remand (#19) on June 17,
25
2011.
Both Cessna Aircraft Company and Continental Motors, Inc.
26
opposed the motion to remand.
No other defendants have joined in
27
removal or responded to the motion to remand.
28
1
A hearing on the
1
2
motion to remand is scheduled for November 9, 2011, at 10:30 a.m.
On September 8, 2011, defendant Cessna Aircraft Company was
3
dismissed without prejudice through a stipulation.
4
2011, defendant Continental Motors, Inc. was dismissed without
5
prejudice through a stipulation.
On October 13,
6
All remaining defendants who have been served with the summons
7
and complaint in this action shall have ten (10) days from the date
8
of this order in which to join in removal or respond to the motion
9
to remand.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED: This 18th day of October, 2011.
12
13
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?