Fowler v. Peery et al
Filing
9
ORDER DENYING 8 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/14/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
PAUL D. FOWLER,
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
Plaintiff prisoner sued Defendants in this Court, alleging several constitutional violations
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
JOHN PEERY et al.,
10
Defendants.
3:11-cv-00421-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
13
arising out of Defendants’ refusal to permit him to carry with him at all times a water bottle of
14
his choice. The Court screened and dismissed the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
15
Plaintiff has filed the present motion to reconsider pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1). First, the Court’s
16
dismissal was based upon the merits, not upon any “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable
17
neglect” cognizable under Rule 60(b)(1). Second, the motion contains no argumentation why
18
Plaintiff believes the Court erred in a way warranting relief under Rules 59(e) or 60(b)(6).
CONCLUSION
19
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Reconsider (ECF No. 8) is DENIED.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
Dated this 14th day of August, 2012.
23
24
25
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?