Steve v. Forgeran et al

Filing 38

ORDER GRANTING Ds' 34 Motion to stay discovery, and GRANTING 34 Motion to stay P's 30 Cross-motion for summary judgment. The court construes # 36 Response as an unauthorized sur-reply and it is hereby STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 3/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
LAWSON G. STEVE,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
MESHELL PRAWITZ, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________)
PRESENT:

3:11-CV-0423-HDM (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
March 6, 2012

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is defendants’ motion to stay discovery and for a denial or stay of
plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment (#34). Plaintiff opposed the motion (#35),
and defendants replied (#37).
Defendants’ motion to stay discovery (#34) is GRANTED. Defendants’ motion to stay
plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment (#34) is GRANTED. Defendants shall
not be required to respond to plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment until ten days
after the court has ruled on defendants’ motion to dismiss, if necessary.
The court notes that plaintiff has filed a second response to defendants’ motion to dismiss
(#36). The court construes this response as an unauthorized sur-reply and it is hereby
STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk