Plaisted v. Shinseki

Filing 13

ORDER DENYING as moot D's 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ROBERT PLAISTED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ERIC ) SHINSEKI, in his official ) capacity as Secretary of the ) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00442-HDM-WGC ORDER 22 On August 26, 2011, defendant Shinseki filed a motion to 23 dismiss the complaint on the grounds that the United States is the 24 only proper party in a Federal Tort Claims Act action, which 25 plaintiff had alleged in the original complaint. (Docket No. 6) 26 September 9, 2011, this court granted the parties’ stipulation to 27 extend the time in which to file a response to the motion to 28 dismiss, extending the time to respond to September 26, 2011. 1 On 1 (Docket No. 9) 2 stipulation for plaintiff to file an amended complaint for the 3 purpose of adding the United States as a defendant, which this 4 court granted on September 27, 2011. 5 October 17, 2011, the plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint and 6 Jury Demand adding the United States as a defendant. (Docket No. 7 12) 8 DENIED as moot. 9 10 On September 26, 2011, the parties filed a (Docket Nos. 10, 11) Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss (Docket No. 6) is IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: This 18th day of October, 2011. 11 12 On ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?