National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. John Davis Trucking Company, Inc.

Filing 116

ORDER. The court concludes that the motion to strike Union Pacific's answerand counterclaim 99 and motion to dismiss National Railroad Passenger Corporation's complaint 97 are premature. They are for that reason denied without prejudice, to renew after the close of discovery and no later than the dispositive motions deadline. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/1/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) JOHN DAVIS TRUCKING COMPANY, ) INC., ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________ ) ) JOHN DAVIS TRUCKING COMPANY, ) INC., ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) vs. ) ) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ) CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC ) RAILROAD COMPANY, and DOES 1-5, ) ) Counterdefendants. ) _________________________________ ) ) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) vs. ) ) JOHN DAVIS TRUCKING COMPANY, ) INC., ) ) Counterdefendant. ) _________________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00461-HDM-VPC ORDER 25 Before the court is John Davis Trucking Company’s motion to 26 strike Union Pacific’s answer and counterclaim (#99) and motion to 27 dismiss National Railroad Passenger Corporation’s complaint (#97) 28 1 1 on the ground of spoliation of evidence. 2 completed in this case until February 28, 2013. 3 Issues that have been raised in the motions and the responses 4 thereto clearly relate to ongoing discovery. 5 court concludes that the motion to strike Union Pacific’s answer 6 and counterclaim (#99) and motion to dismiss National Railroad 7 Passenger Corporation’s complaint (#97) are premature. 8 for that reason denied without prejudice, to renew after the close 9 of discovery and no later than the dispositive motions deadline. 10 (See Doc. #94). Accordingly, the IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Discovery will not be DATED: This 1st day of August, 2012. 12 13 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 They are

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?