Recinos v. LeGrand et al

Filing 7

ORDERED that the Clerk shall FILE and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (docket # 1 -1) on the Rs. FURTHER ORD Rs answer/response to petition due by 10/6/2011. FURTHER ORD henceforth P shall serve AG a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration w certificate of service. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9
10

OBDULIO RECINOS,

11

Petitioner,

12

vs.

13

ROBERT LEGRAND, et al.,

14
15
16
17
18

Respondents.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:11-CV-00492-HDM-VPC
ORDER

Obdulio Recinos, a Nevada prisoner, has submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket #1-1).
Petitioner has now paid the filing fee (see docket #6). Therefore, the habeas petition will
be filed and docketed, and it will be served upon the respondents.

19

A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which

20

petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred

21

from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) (successive petitions). If

22

petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he should notify the court of that as soon

23

as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his petition to add the claim.

24
25
26

IT

IS

THEREFORE

ORDERED

that

the

Clerk

ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (docket #1-1) on the respondents.

shall

FILE

and

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from

2

entry of this order within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the petition. In their answer or other

3

response, respondents shall address any claims presented by petitioner in his petition as well as any

4

claims presented by petitioner in any Statement of Additional Claims. Respondents shall raise all

5

potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and

6

procedural default. Successive motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If an answer is filed,

7

respondents shall comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Proceedings in the

8

United States District Courts under 28 U.S.C. §2254. If an answer is filed, petitioner shall have forty-

9

five (45) days from the date of service of the answer to file a reply.

10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, henceforth, petitioner shall serve upon the Attorney

11

General of the State of Nevada a copy of every pleading, motion, or other document he submits for

12

consideration by the court. Petitioner shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a

13

certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the Attorney

14

General. The court may disregard any paper that does not include a certificate of service. After

15

respondents appear in this action, petitioner shall make such service upon the particular Deputy Attorney

16

General assigned to the case.

17

Dated this 22nd day of August, 2011.

18
19

___________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2