Renteria et al v. Canepa

Filing 26

ORDER granting 24 Motion for Judgment Debtor Exam. Defendant Eugene Cleveland Canepa shall appear at 9:00 a.m. on Monday, November 12, 2012, at the offices of Holland & Hart, LLP, 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor, Reno, Nevada 89511 to answe r questions regarding assets and his means of paying judgment. A copy of this order shall be personally served upon judgment debtor at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the hearing scheduled herein and proof of service filed with the Court. Failure to appear may subject debtor to punishment for contempt of court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 9 10 11 OSCAR RENTERIA, et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) EUGENE CLEVELAND CANEPA, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 3:11-cv-00534-ECR-CWH ORDER 12 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ renewed Application for Order Setting 13 Judgment Debtor Exam (#24), filed October 10, 2012. Having secured a judgment in its favor for 14 approximately $999,000.00, Plaintiffs request an order requiring Defendant Canepa to appear for a 15 judgment debtor examination. 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 provides that the procedure regarding “proceedings 17 supplementary and in aid of judgment or execution–must accord with the procedure of the state 18 where the court is located.” Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(1). Rule 69 further provides 19 that “[i]n aid of judgment or execution, the judgment creditor or a successor in interest whose 20 interest appears of record may obtain discovery from any person–including the judgment debtor–as 21 provided in these rules or by the procedure of the state where the court is located.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 69(a)(2). The scope of post-judgment discovery is broad and the judgment-creditor is permitted to 23 make a broad inquiry to discover any hidden or concealed assets of a judgment-debtor. 1st 24 Technology, LLC v. Rational Enterprises, LTDA, 2007 WL 5596692 *4 (D. Nev.) (citation 25 omitted). Rule 69 permits a judgment creditor to obtain post-judgment discovery pursuant to the 26 procedures set forth in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or pursuant to state law. Id. Under 27 Nevada law: 28 A judgment creditor, at any time after the judgment is entered, is entitled to an order from the court requiring the judgment debtor to appear and answer upon 1 oath or affirmation concerning his or her property, before: 2 (a) The judge or a master appointed by the judge; or 3 (b) An attorney representing the judgment creditor, 4 at a time and place specified in the order. No judgment debtor may be required to appear outside the county in which the judgment debtor resides. 5 Nevada Revised Statutes (“NRS”) 21.270(1). The undersigned has reviewed Plaintiff’s request and 6 finds there is goods cause for the requested relief. Accordingly, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ renewed Application for Order Setting 8 Judgment Debtor Exam (#24) is granted. 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Eugene Cleveland Canepa shall appear at 10 9:00 a.m. on Monday, November 12, 2012, at the offices of Holland & Hart LLP, 5441 Kietzke 11 Lane, Second Floor, Reno, Nevada 89511 to then and there answer questions under oath regarding 12 his assets and his means of paying the judgment in this matter and for such other proceedings as 13 there may occur consistent with proceedings supplementary to execution. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order shall be personally served upon the 15 judgment debtor at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the hearing scheduled herein and proof 16 of service filed with the Court. Failure to appear may subject the judgment debtor to punishment 17 for contempt of court. 18 DATED this 15th day of October, 2012. 19 20 21 22 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?