Mizzoni v. Brooks et al
Filing
46
ORDER adopting and accepting 41 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and granting 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
*****
8
9
10
11
12
JOSEPH L. MIZZONI,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
DEBRA BROOKS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00632-LRH-WGC
O RDER
13
14
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G.
15
Cobb (#411 ) entered on September 19, 2012, recommending granting Defendants’ Motion for
16
Summary Judgment (#16) filed on April 6, 2012. Plaintiff filed his Motion to Respond by a (sic)
17
Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#44) on October 1, 2012. Defendants
18
did not file a response. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
19
636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the
20
District of Nevada.
21
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
22
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
23
to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate
24
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#41) entered on September 19, 2012, should be adopted and
25
accepted.
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#41)
2
entered on September 19, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Defendants’ Motion for Summary
3
Judgment (#16) is GRANTED.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
DATED this 9th day of November, 2012.
6
7
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?