Manley v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
142
ORDER GRANTING 140 & 141 MotionS to Extend Time : 1. Defendants shall have an enlargement of time up to and including October 28, 2013, within which to submit their responses to Plaintiff's second set of interrogatories to Defendant Rowley; and, 2. Defendants shall have an extension of time to and including November 5, 2013, within which to file their reply to the Plaintiff's 133 opposition to Defendants' # 122 Motion for partial dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CHARLES MANLEY, JR.
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00636-RCJ-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
October 22, 2013
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Discovery
(First Request). (Doc. # 140.) Defendants seek a one week enlargement of time, until October 28,
2013, to submit their responses to Plaintiff’s set of interrogatories to Defendant Rowley. Also before
the court is Defendants’ Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to
Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal (Second Request) (Doc. # 141.) Defendants ask the court
for an extension of time to and including November 5, 2013, to submit their reply to Plaintiff’s
opposition to the Defendants’ motion for partial dismissal.
Good cause appearing, Defendants’ motions (Docs. # 140 and # 141) are GRANTED, as
follows:
1. Defendants shall have an enlargement of time up to and including October 28, 2013,
within which to submit their responses to Plaintiff’s second set of interrogatories to Defendant
Rowley; and,
2. Defendants shall have an extension of time to and including November 5, 2013, within
which to file their reply to the Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for partial dismissal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?