Manley v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
231
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 3/27/2014, denying 217 Motion for Court Order to Extend NDOC Copy Work Limit. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CHARLES S. MANLEY, JR.
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00636-RCJ-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
March 27, 2014
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff's Motion for Court Order to Extend the NDOC Copy Work Limit
(2nd Request). (Doc. # 217.) The court previously deferred a decision on Plaintiff's motion pending
receipt of a report from Defendants concerning the status of Plaintiff's copy work balance. (Doc.
# 217.) Subsequent thereto Defendants provided their report (Doc. # 222) and Plaintiff responded
(Doc. # 227). After review of the parties' briefing on the subject, the court was still unable to discern
an accurate balance of plaintiff's copy work expenditures and directed Defendants to submit a
Supplemental Statement regarding Plaintiff's inmate banking accounts. (Doc. # 228.)
The court has now received the Defendants' Supplemental Report. (Doc. # 229.) The report
reflects that with the addition of the court's recent extension of plaintiff's copy work allowance in
this case ($20.00; Doc. # 216), the total amount available to Plaintiff copy work as of March 21,
2014, is $43.40. It thus appears Plaintiff has more than an adequate amount available for copy work
funds.
Plaintiff's motion (Doc. # 217) is therefore DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?