Thompson et al v. Lake et al

Filing 46

ORDERED that the court's order for the filing of a joint proposed pretrial order, contained in the # 44 Order on Mandate, was premature and is hereby VACATED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/11/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

RICHARD THOMPSON, a Nevada resident; )
KEVIN BATTERSHELL, a California
)
resident,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
KEVIN LAKE, a Nevada resident; ERIC
)
MARCONATO, a Nevada resident;
)
ANTONIO MARCONATO, a Nevada
)
resident; JAMES AHDUNKO, a Nevada
)
resident; CHRIS ROWE, a Nevada resident; )
WESLEY KELLER, a Nevada resident; the )
CITY OF SPARKS, NEVADA,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

19

3:11-CV-00644-LRH-WGC
ORDER

It having come to the court’s attention that the parties in this matter filed a Stipulation

20

(doc. # 211) to extend the time to submit their Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order until

21

fifteen (15) days after the court had issued an order on the motions for summary judgment, and that

22

on May 2, 2012, Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb granted that stipulation (#31), and GOOD

23

CAUSE APPEARING,

24

///

25
26

1

Refers to the court’s docket number.

1

It appearing that the court mistakenly assumed discovery had been completed in this action,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court’s order for the filing of a joint proposed pretrial order,

3

contained in the Order on Mandate (#44), was premature and is hereby VACATED.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

DATED this 11th day of May, 2015.

6

__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2