Villagrana v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 29

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 12/7/2011. Ds' 19 motion to strike and the 21 joinder are GRANTED. Clerk is directed to STRIKE P's 8 statement in removal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA GUSTAVO VILLAGRANA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00652-ECR (WGC) MINUTES OF THE COURT December 7, 2011 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: JENNIFER COTTER REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: On September 12, 2011, this court entered an order directing that “all parties removing actions to the court” must file a statement concerning removal (Doc. #2). On September 27, 2011, defendants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et.al., filed their “Statement re Removal” (Doc. #6) in compliance with this court’s minute order (Doc. #2). Plaintiff thereafter filed a “Statement re Removal” on October 3, 2011 (Doc. #8). Plaintiff, however, was not a “removing party” and thus the court’s order (Doc #2) did not apply to plaintiff. On October 26, 2011, defendants Countrywide, et al., filed a Motion to Strike (Doc. #8) Statement in Removal Case filed by plaintiff. (Doc. #19.) Defendant First Centennial filed a Joinder to the Motion to Strike on November 1, 2011. (Doc. #21.) No opposition to the motion to strike has been filed. Good cause appearing, therefore, defendants’ motion to strike (Doc. #19) and the joinder thereto (Doc. #21) are GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to strike plaintiff’s statement in removal (Doc. #8). IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?