Villagrana v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
29
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 12/7/2011. Ds' 19 motion to strike and the 21 joinder are GRANTED. Clerk is directed to STRIKE P's 8 statement in removal. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
GUSTAVO VILLAGRANA,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________
)
3:11-cv-00652-ECR (WGC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
December 7, 2011
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
JENNIFER COTTER
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
On September 12, 2011, this court entered an order directing that “all parties
removing actions to the court” must file a statement concerning removal (Doc. #2). On
September 27, 2011, defendants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., et.al., filed their
“Statement re Removal” (Doc. #6) in compliance with this court’s minute order (Doc. #2).
Plaintiff thereafter filed a “Statement re Removal” on October 3, 2011 (Doc. #8). Plaintiff,
however, was not a “removing party” and thus the court’s order (Doc #2) did not apply to
plaintiff.
On October 26, 2011, defendants Countrywide, et al., filed a Motion to Strike
(Doc. #8) Statement in Removal Case filed by plaintiff. (Doc. #19.) Defendant First
Centennial filed a Joinder to the Motion to Strike on November 1, 2011. (Doc. #21.) No
opposition to the motion to strike has been filed.
Good cause appearing, therefore, defendants’ motion to strike (Doc. #19) and the
joinder thereto (Doc. #21) are GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to strike plaintiff’s
statement in removal (Doc. #8).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?