Thomas v. McDaniel et al
Filing
55
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 7/3/2013, denying 48 Motion to Strike. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
MARLO THOMAS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
E.K. MCDANIEL, et. al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
PRESENT:
3:11-cv-00664-LRH-VPC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
July 3, 2013
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
LISA MANN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to strike E.K. McDaniel’s declaration from the
record (#48). 1 Defendants opposed (#53) and plaintiff replied (#54). Plaintiff asks the court to
strike defendant McDaniel’s declaration submitted in support of defendants’ opposition to
plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (#46, Ex. B (sealed)). Plaintiff alleges that defendant
McDaniel’s declaration contains perjured statements, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Defendants oppose plaintiff’s motion to strike, arguing that they are entitled to present evidence
in support of their opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and that if plaintiff
disagrees with defendant McDaniel’s characterization of the evidence, plaintiff may present his
own rebuttal evidence in his reply memorandum supporting his motion for summary judgment.
A federal court has inherent authority to regulate the conduct of those appearing before it
and to manage the administration of its business. Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th Cir.
1995). Here, the court finds no reason to strike defendant McDaniel’s declaration. Plaintiff has
filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for summary judgment (#49). Consequently,
plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to rebut this evidence.
1
Refers to the court’s docket numbers.
Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike E.K. McDaniel’s declaration from the record
(#48) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?