Thomas v. McDaniel et al

Filing 55

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke, on 7/3/2013, denying 48 Motion to Strike. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MARLO THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) E.K. MCDANIEL, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) PRESENT: 3:11-cv-00664-LRH-VPC MINUTES OF THE COURT July 3, 2013 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to strike E.K. McDaniel’s declaration from the record (#48). 1 Defendants opposed (#53) and plaintiff replied (#54). Plaintiff asks the court to strike defendant McDaniel’s declaration submitted in support of defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (#46, Ex. B (sealed)). Plaintiff alleges that defendant McDaniel’s declaration contains perjured statements, in violation of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendants oppose plaintiff’s motion to strike, arguing that they are entitled to present evidence in support of their opposition to plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; and that if plaintiff disagrees with defendant McDaniel’s characterization of the evidence, plaintiff may present his own rebuttal evidence in his reply memorandum supporting his motion for summary judgment. A federal court has inherent authority to regulate the conduct of those appearing before it and to manage the administration of its business. Spurlock v. F.B.I., 69 F.3d 1010, 1016 (9th Cir. 1995). Here, the court finds no reason to strike defendant McDaniel’s declaration. Plaintiff has filed a reply memorandum supporting his motion for summary judgment (#49). Consequently, plaintiff has been afforded an opportunity to rebut this evidence. 1 Refers to the court’s docket numbers. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion to strike E.K. McDaniel’s declaration from the record (#48) is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?