Kublawi v. Palmer et al

Filing 3

ORDERED that P's # 1 Application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Clerk shall detach and file the petition and motion for appointment of counsel. (Copy of filed petition mailed to P 11/3/2011) FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Appointment of Couns el (# 1 -2) is GRANTED. The FPD is appointed to represent P. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall E-SERVE FPD and Rs with a copy of this Order, together with a copy of the petition for WHC and its attachments. (E-service performed 11/3/2011) The FPD file a notice of appearance by 12/3/2011 or indicate to the Court its inability to represent P. Rs shall have 20 days to file a notice of appearance. FURTHER ORDERED that, after counsel has appeared for P in this case, the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of a First Amended Petition. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 11/1/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 MOUNIR A. KUBLAWI, 10 11 12 13 14 ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) JACK PALMER, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ____________________________________/ 3:11-CV-0789-ECR-VPC ORDER 15 16 Petitioner has filed an Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and has 17 submitted a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and a Motion for 18 Appointment of Counsel. 19 The financial information provided in support of the Application to Proceed in Forma 20 Pauperis indicates that petitioner is unable to pay the filing fee. Therefore, his in forma pauperis 21 application shall be granted. 22 The Court will also grant petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The 23 petition filed in this action includes several claims and has attached a large volume of exhibits and 24 supporting documentation, suggesting that it may be a relatively complex petition. Furthermore, 25 petitioner faces a lengthy sentence. Moreover, the issues raised in the petition suggest a possible 26 need for investigation of background facts. 1 Therefore, the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) shall be 2 appointed to represent petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent petitioner, due to a conflict of 3 interest or other reason, then alternate counsel for petitioner shall be located, and the Court will enter 4 a separate order appointing such alternate counsel. In either case, counsel will represent petitioner 5 in all future federal proceedings relating to this matter (including subsequent actions) and appeals 6 therefrom, unless allowed to withdraw. 7 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s application to proceed in forma 8 pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall detach and file the petition and motion for 9 appointment of counsel. 10 11 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-2) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender is appointed to represent Petitioner. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE 13 the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) and respondents with a copy of this 14 Order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus and its attachments. The FPD 15 shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order to file a notice of appearance or to 16 indicate to the Court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings. Respondents shall 17 have twenty days to file a notice of appearance identifying the name and contact information for the 18 attorney assigned to the case. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this 20 case, the Court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the 21 filing of a First Amended Petition. 22 DATED this 1st day of November 2011. 23 24 25 ___________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?