Funches v. Rimington

Filing 15

AG SHALL FILE the required report re 90-day stay by 4/7/2012. P's # 10 Motion for a copy of the complaint is GRANTED. P's # 14 Motion for stay is DENIED. Ckerk SHALL SEND P, at his current address of record, copies of the following docume nts: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Notice, # 3 Screening Order, # 12 Order Scheduling Mediation, and a copy of this order. (Copies mailed to P 3/28/2012.) Clerk SHALL ELECTRONICALLY SERVE a copy of this order and a copy of P's # 1 Complaint on AG, (E-service 3/28/2012; Complaint via NEF regeneraton.) AG shall advise the Court by 4/18/2012 re acceptance of service for named Ds; and file under seal address(es) for Ds for which service not accepted; if service not accepted P shall file a motion. If service accepted then answer due 5/26/2012. Henceforth P shall serve Ds every pleading, together w a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/27/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 15 replaced on 3/28/2012) (DRM).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11

MARRITTE FUNCHES,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

RICK RIMINGTON, et al.,

15

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/

3:11-cv-00795-ECR-WGC
ORDER

16
17

This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a state

18

prisoner. Plaintiff paid the full filing fee for this action and the complaint was filed on November 1,

19

2011. (ECF No. 1).

20

On November 10, 2011, this Court entered an order screening the complaint. (ECF No. 5).

21

Pursuant to the Court’s order of November 10, 2011, the action was stayed for 90 days to allow the

22

parties an opportunity to settle their dispute. (Id. at p. 10). The order specified that “on or before

23

ninety (90) days from the date this order is entered, the Office of the Attorney General shall file the

24

report form attached to this order regarding the results of the 90-day stay, even if a stipulation for

25

dismissal is entered upon the end of the 90-day stay.” (Id. at pp. 10-11). A settlement conference

26

via video was held on February 7, 2012, and minutes of the proceedings indicate that settlement was

!

l no ra d.( No.l ) Nevet ls ,odae,t Ofi eoft Ator yGe a f t Stt o
t e che ECF
3.
rhee s t t he tc he t ne nerl or he ae f
2 Ne a ha nottld t r quied r por r ga di t e r s t oft 90- y say, 'her por s lb
vad s
ie he e r e t e r ng h e uls he da t F e t hal e
3 tld,a diece a t c l i oft sor r
i e s r td t he onc uson hi de .
4

TheCour a s a es e t motonsma b pl ntf Pl ntf Gl anotc ofad e s
t lo ddr s s wo
i
de y ai if ai if ed
ie
dr s

5 c
hange on D e em be 1 20l1, n c tng t the w astans er e f om H i D e er St t Prs t a
c
r 2,
i di a i ha
r f rd r
gh s t a e i on o

6 c r tona f iiyi Col a ( No.1 ,Pli ifs ekst hav acopyoft compli s
oreci l aclt n ordo. ECF
0) antf e o e
he
ant ent
7 t hi ( No.1 .Goodc us a eai t rques i grnt
o m. ECF
0)
a e pp rng,he e t s a ed.
#
Pli ifhasas fldamotonf asa i t sc s ( No.1 .Pl ntf i or te
antf
lo ie
i or ty n hi a e. ECF
4) ai if nf ms h
9 Cour t ,
t hat upon hi ta f rt t e Col a De rmen ofCore tons, sI fl r e ntt
s r ns e o h
or do pa t t
r c i hi egai ies elva o

l t sca ewer notta erd wihhi ( No.1 atp.2) TheCour de i t gr afrhe
0 hi s e rnsfre t m. ECF
4
.
l clnes o ant u t r
11 s a i t sa i bu t e Cl k ofCouf wilbe die t d t s pl ntf t r e ntc t
t y n hi cton, t h er
t l
r c e o end ai if he el va our
1 docum e s t th be fl i t i t c s
2
nt ha ave en ied n he ns ant a e,

1
3

I I THEREFORE O RDERED a f l :
T S
s olows

1
4

1
.

Wihi tn ( )daysoft e r oft so d ,t Ofieoft Ator y Ge alf
t n e 10
he nty hi r er he fc he t ne ner or

1
5

t e St t ofNeva SHALL FI t r r r tr r ng t r s t oft 90
h ae
da
LE he equied epor ega di he e uls he -

1
6

d y sa
a t y.

l
7

2.

Pl ntf' motonf ac oft c ai ( No.l i GRANTED.
ai ifs i or opy he ompl nt ECF
0) s

1
8

3.

Pl ntf moi f asa ( No.l i DENI
ai ips ton or ty ECF
4) s
ED.

1
9

4.

The Clr ofCou tSH ALL SEND t pl ntf , thi cu r a es ofr cor
ek
r
o ai if a s rent ddr s e d,

20

copi oft f l ngdocume s ECFNo.1(
es he olowi
nt:
Compl nt,BCFNo. ( tce,
ai )
2 Noi )

21

ECFNo. ( re ngOr l ECFNo.1 ( de Sc duln l maeEm' Mediton
5 Sce ni dery
2 Or r he ig n t l
y
ai

22

Confr ce,a lacop oft sor r
een ) ni
y hi de .

23

24

5.

'

25

26

TheClr SHALL ELECTRONI
ek
CALLY SERVE acopy oft sor rand ac
hi de
opy

ofpl ntf compl nt( No.1 ont Ofi oft Ator e Genea oft
ai ifs
ai ECF
) he fce he t n y
rl he
Stt ofNe da,at i Pa el Sh r
ae
va
tenton m a a p.

6.

TheAtoreyGenealsOfi es ladviet Cour wihi G ent one( )da of
tn
r ' tc hal s he
t tn
z- 21 ys
2

1

the date of the entry of this order whether it can accept service of process for the

2

named defendants. As to any of the named defendants for which the Attorney

3

General’s Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last

4

known address(es) of those defendant(s).

5

7.

If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a

6

motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and

7

specifying a full name and address for said defendant(s).

8

8.

9

defendant(s) SHALL FILE AND SERVE an answer or other response to the

10
11

If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such

complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
9.

Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been

12

entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other

13

document submitted for consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the

14

original paper submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct

15

copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If

16

counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct service to the

17

individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein.

18

The court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge

19

which has not been filed with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge,

20

magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper

21

service.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

27th
Dated this ______ day of March, 2012.

24
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26

3