Ruiz v. Baker et al
Filing
48
ORDER that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
_____________________________________
CARLOS RUIZ,
8
9
10
11
Petitioner,
vs.
RENEE BAKER et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
3:11-cv-00844-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
12
13
Petitioner Carlos Ruiz, a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of
14
Corrections pursuant to convictions in the Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada,
15
petitioned this Court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The Court denied
16
the Petition and a motion to reconsider. Both this Court and the Court of Appeals denied a
17
certificate of appealability. Petitioner sought relief from judgment to file an amended petition
18
with an additional ground for relief, i.e., ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel. The
19
Court denied the motion, and Petitioner appealed.
20
21
22
23
24
1 of 2
1
The Court of Appeals has remanded for the limited purpose of determining whether a
2
certificate of appealability should issue. The Court finds that a certificate of appealability should
3
not issue because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of any
4
constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Specifically, habeas corpus relief is not
5
available under § 2254 based on ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel. Martinez v.
6
Ryan, 132 S. Ct. 1309, 1320 (2012) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254(i)); see also Pennsylvania v.
7
Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 554 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 430 (9th Cir. 1993).
8
Petitioner does not seek merely to invoke ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel to
9
excuse a procedural default of some other claim; he seeks to bring a freestanding claim of
10
ineffective assistance of post-conviction counsel as a basis for habeas corpus relief.
CONCLUSION
11
12
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
Dated this 10th day ofof January, 2017.
24th day January, 2017.
15
16
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?