Paterson v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
102
ORDER - Defendant Eugene Columbus' # 46 Motion for summary judgment and his # 63 Motion to strike plaintiff's # 62 Sur-reply are hereby GRANTED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
12
13
14
15
16
17
JEFFREY S. PATERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PATTERSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00845-HDM-WGC
ORDER
18
The court has considered the report and recommendation of the
19
United States Magistrate Judge (#66) filed on August 22, 2013, in
20
which the magistrate judge recommends granting defendant Eugene
21
Columbus’ motion for summary judgment (#46) and motion to strike
22
plaintiff’s sur-reply (#63).
23
The court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the
24
parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review
25
and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C.
26
§ 636 and applicable case law, and the court hereby accepts and
27
adopts the report and recommendation of the United States
28
1
1
2
Magistrate Judge (#66).
In response to plaintiff’s objections (#71), the court notes
3
that plaintiff’s complaint does not assert any claim against
4
defendant Columbus based on his status as defendant Patterson’s
5
supervisor, nor is there any evidence that supports such a claim.
6
Accordingly, defendant Eugene Columbus’ motion for summary
7
judgment (#46) and his motion to strike plaintiff’s sur-reply (#63)
8
are hereby GRANTED.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: This 20th day of February, 2014.
11
12
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?