Paterson v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
29
ORDER - This action shall be dismissed without prejudice as to specified parties unless on or before September 21, 2012, there is filed with the clerk proof of service thereon. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
JEFFREY S. PATERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PATTERSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00845-HDM-WGC
ORDER
16
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) provides, in part, as
17
follows:
18
22
If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon
a defendant within 120 days after the filing of the
complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own
initiative after notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss
the action without prejudice as to that defendant or
direct that service be effected within a specified time;
provided that if the plaintiff shows good cause for the
failure, the court shall extend the time of service. . .
23
The complaint in this action was screened and filed on
19
20
21
24
December 15, 2011.
25
immediately stayed for 90 days.
26
2012.
27
which to effectuate service on the defendants.
28
of service has been filed as to defendants Adolph Stankus and
Pursuant to the screening order, the action was
The stay expired on March 14,
Plaintiff thus has up to and including July 12, 2012, in
1
To date, no proof
1
2
Patterson.
Notice is hereby given that this action shall be dismissed
3
without prejudice as to said parties unless on or before September
4
21, 2012, there is filed with the clerk proof of service on the
5
above-named parties, which service must have taken place prior to
6
the expiration of the 120-day time limit set forth in Fed. R. Civ.
7
P. 4(m), or good cause is shown why such service was not made in
8
that period.
9
10
Failure to comply with this notice shall result in automatic
dismissal of the action without prejudice as to said parties.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
DATED: This 22nd day of August, 2012.
13
14
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?