Paterson v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
49
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 5/6/2013, denying as moot 45 Motion Request for Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JEFFREY S. PATERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
THE STATE OF NEVADA, ex rel.
)
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
)
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00845-HDM-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
May 6, 2013
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Request for Order.” (Doc. #45.) Plaintiff seeks entry of an
order directing the Nevada Department of Corrections to allow him access to view a NOTIS report
which was provided by the Attorney General’s office for Plaintiff to review in this case. Plaintiff
states that when he submitted a kite seeking to view the documents the reply was “not approved in
this matter will provide upon proper order.” (Id. at 1.) Defendants have responded (Doc. # 48),
stating that upon receipt of Plaintiff’s request, counsel for Defendants contacted the Warden’s Office
and advised them that Plaintiff shall have the ability to review the documents (id. at 1). Defendants’
response attached Exhibit A, an NDOC Case Note Printout Report, reflecting that on 4/30/13,
Plaintiff was allowed twenty minutes to review the documents.
It therefore appears that this matter has been resolved without court intervention. For that
reason, Plaintiff’s request (Doc. # 45) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?