Paterson v. State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
78
ORDER - The court construes plaintiff's 74 amended complaint as an amendment to add Chester Patterson as a party only. All prior orders of the court with respect to the 4 original complaint remain in effect as to the 74 amended complaint . In accordance with the court's 9/17/2013 order, the U.S. Marshal shall serve a copy of the 74 amended complaint on Chester Patterson. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 09/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
13
14
15
16
JEFFREY S. PATERSON,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PATTERSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_________________________________ )
3:11-cv-00845-HDM-WGC
ORDER
17
On August 23, 2013, the magistrate judge granted plaintiff
18
leave to amend to name the proper defendant, Chester Patterson, and
19
ordered that the complaint (#4) be amended by interlineation to
20
reflect the same.
On September 16, 2013, the plaintiff filed an
21
amended complaint adding Chester Patterson as a party.
Save for
22
this amendment, the complaint is identical to the plaintiff’s
23
original complaint.
The court construes plaintiff’s amended
24
complaint (#74) as an amendment to add Chester Patterson as a party
25
only.
All prior orders of the court with respect to the original
26
complaint (#4) remain in effect as to the amended complaint (#74).
27
In accordance with the court’s order of September 17, 2013, the
28
1
1
United States Marshal shall serve a copy of the amended complaint
2
(#74) on Chester Patterson.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED: This 30th day of September, 2013.
5
6
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?