Navas v. Byron et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re Magistrate Judge's 16 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 9 First Amended Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 04/09/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 ***** 9 10 11 12 13 JULIO CESAR NAVAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ANNA MARIE BYRON, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) 3:11-cv-00868-LRH-VPC ORDER 14 15 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P. 16 Cooke (#161 ) entered on February 26, 2013, recommending dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff’s First 17 Amended Civil Rights Complaint (#9), filed on October 3, 2012. No objection to the Report and 18 Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court 20 for the District of Nevada. 21 The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and 22 memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) 23 and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 24 (#16) entered on February 26, 2013, should be adopted and accepted. 25 26 1 Refers to court’s docket number. 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#16) 2 entered on February 26, 2013, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s First Amended Civil Rights 3 Complaint (#9) is DISMISSED with prejudice. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED this 9th day of April, 2013. 7 _______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?