Barcena v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to certify questions 12 and motion to intervene 13 are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

9

ALEJANDRA BARCENA,

10

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; et al.,

13

Defendants.

3:11-cv-0880-LRH-VPC
ORDER

14
15
16
17
18

Before the court are plaintiff Alejandra Barcena’s (“Barcena”) motion to certify questions to
the Nevada Supreme Court (Doc. #12) and motion to intervene and consolidate (Doc. #13).
On March 29, 2012, the court dismissed Barcena’s complaint for failure to state a claim.
Doc. #16. Accordingly, the court shall deny Barcena’s remaining motions as moot.

19
20
21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to certify questions (Doc. #12) and
motion to intervene (Doc. #13) are DENIED as moot.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

DATED this 11th day of April, 2012.

24
25
26

__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE