Downs v. River City Group LLC et al
Filing
218
ORDER denying without prejudice 181 , 188 , and 191 Motions. Within 30 days of the entry of this order the parties shall file any similar motions should they decide to proceed with similar motions in this matter (due by 1/9/2014). Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 12/09/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
LINDA DOWNS,
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
RIVER CITY GROUP, LLC; et al.,
13
Defendants.
3:11-cv-0885-LRH-WGC
ORDER
14
15
Before the court are various motions from the parties including defendant Minnesota Life
16
Insurance Company’s motion to preclude testimony (Doc. #1811) and plaintiff Linda Downs’
17
(“Downs”) motion to compel further discovery as to defendant Minnesota Life Insurance Company
18
(Doc. #188) and motion to compel further discovery as to defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
19
(Doc. #191).
20
The court has recently issued orders on several substantive motions including two motions
21
for summary judgment and a motion for reconsideration. In light of these recent orders, the court
22
shall deny the pending motions without prejudice to allow the parties the opportunity to review the
23
court’s orders and determine how and whether to proceed with similar motions in this litigation.
24
///
25
26
1
Refers to the court’s docket entry number.
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant’s motion to preclude testimony (Doc. #181)
and plaintiffs motions to compel (Doc. ##188, 191) are DENIED without prejudice.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order the
4
parties shall file any similar motions should they decide to proceed with similar motions in this
5
matter.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
DATED this 9th day of December, 2013.
8
9
10
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?