O'Neill v. Baker et al

Filing 79

ORDER that Respondents' motion to extend time to file an answer (ECF No. 75 ) and Petitioner's motion to extend time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF No. 77 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/31/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

CHRISTOPHER O’NEILL,

10

Case No. 3:11-cv-00901-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14

This action is Christopher O’Neill’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant

15

to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before the Court are motions for extension of time by both parties.

16

The Court finds that there is good cause to grant both motions.

17

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motion to extend time to file an answer

18

(ECF No. 75) and Petitioner’s motion to extend time to file a reply in support of the

19

petition (ECF No. 77) are both granted nunc pro tunc.

20
21

DATED THIS 31st day of July.

22
23
MIRANDA DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
1