Green v. Bannister et al

Filing 73

ERRATA re 70 Order : The Court inadvertently referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke for a settlement conference; the settlement conference should have been referred to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. The remaining content s of the Order stand. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is referred to the Honorable William G. Cobb for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 ***** 9 10 11 12 13 MATTHEW GREEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ROBERT BANNISTER; et al, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) 3:12-cv-00004-LRH-WGC ERRATA 14 15 On January 23, 2014, this Court entered its Order (#701) adopting and accepting the Report and 16 Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#69) entered on December 9, 2013. The 17 Court inadvertently referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke for a settlement 18 conference; the settlement conference should have been referred to Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb. 19 The remaining contents of the Order stand. 20 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is referred to the Honorable William G. Cobb 21 for the purpose of conducting a settlement conference. 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 26 1 Refers to court’s docket number. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if settlement is unsuccessful, the remaining parties shall 2 submit their proposed joint pretrial order pursuant to Local Court Rules 16-3 and 16-4 within forty-five 3 (45) days of the unsuccessful settlement conference. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED this 25th day of February, 2014. 6 7 _______________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?