Debarr v. Carpentar et al

Filing 11

ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the stay previously entered herein is lifted and that, within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and plaintiff of:(a) the names of the defen dant(s) for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it is filing last-knownaddress information under seal. As to any of the named defendant(s) for whom the Attorney General'sOffice cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plain tiff shall file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s). If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (See Order for specifics)(Notice of Compliance is due by 9/4/2012. Response/Answer due 10/13/2012) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/4/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 8 BRIAN JOEL DEBARR, 9 Plaintiff, 10 3:12-cv-00039-ECR-WGC vs. 11 ORDER TARA CARPENTER, et al. 12 Defendants. 13 14 The parties did not reach a settlement in the mediation, and the matter now shall proceed 15 forward. 16 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 17 1. That the stay previously entered herein is lifted and that, within twenty-one (21) days of 18 entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and plaintiff of: 19 (a) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendant(s) for 20 whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it is filing last-known21 address information under seal. As to any of the named defendant(s) for whom the Attorney General's 22 Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those 23 defendant(s) for whom it has such information. 24 2. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a 25 motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full 26 name for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the Attorney General has not provided 27 last-known-address information, plaintiff shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s). 28 1 3. If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such 2 defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days 3 from the date of this order. 4 4. Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered 5 by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for 6 consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a 7 certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or 8 counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct 9 service to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein. The 10 Court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed 11 with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to 12 include a certificate showing proper service. 13 DATED: August 14, 2012. 14 15 16 17 _________________________________ WILLIAM G. COBB United States Magistrate Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?