Debarr v. Carpentar et al
Filing
11
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the stay previously entered herein is lifted and that, within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and plaintiff of:(a) the names of the defen dant(s) for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it is filing last-knownaddress information under seal. As to any of the named defendant(s) for whom the Attorney General'sOffice cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plain tiff shall file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s). If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days from the date of this order. (See Order for specifics)(Notice of Compliance is due by 9/4/2012. Response/Answer due 10/13/2012) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/4/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MLC)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
BRIAN JOEL DEBARR,
9
Plaintiff,
10
3:12-cv-00039-ECR-WGC
vs.
11
ORDER
TARA CARPENTER, et al.
12
Defendants.
13
14
The parties did not reach a settlement in the mediation, and the matter now shall proceed
15
forward.
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
17
1.
That the stay previously entered herein is lifted and that, within twenty-one (21) days of
18
entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court and plaintiff of:
19
(a) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it accepts service; (b) the names of the defendant(s) for
20
whom it does not accept service, and (c) the names of the defendant(s) for whom it is filing last-known21
address information under seal. As to any of the named defendant(s) for whom the Attorney General's
22
Office cannot accept service, the Office shall file, under seal, the last known address(es) of those
23
defendant(s) for whom it has such information.
24
2.
If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), plaintiff shall file a
25
motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and specifying a full
26
name for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the Attorney General has not provided
27
last-known-address information, plaintiff shall provide the full name and address for the defendant(s).
28
1
3.
If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s), such
2
defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within sixty (60) days
3
from the date of this order.
4
4.
Henceforth, plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been entered
5
by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document submitted for
6
consideration by the court. Plaintiff shall include with the original paper submitted for filing a
7
certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document was mailed to the defendants or
8
counsel for the defendants. If counsel has entered a notice of appearance, the plaintiff shall direct
9
service to the individual attorney named in the notice of appearance, at the address stated therein. The
10
Court may disregard any paper received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has not been filed
11
with the Clerk, and any paper received by a district judge, magistrate judge, or the Clerk which fails to
12
include a certificate showing proper service.
13
DATED: August 14, 2012.
14
15
16
17
_________________________________
WILLIAM G. COBB
United States Magistrate Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?