Nunez v. Home Mortgage Direct Lenders et al
Filing
4
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that P's 1 -1 motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
9
DIONICIA NUNEZ
10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
HOME MORTGAGE DIRECT LENDERS;
et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
3:12-cv-0073-LRH-VPC
ORDER
Before the court is plaintiff Dionicia Nunez’s (“Nunez”) motion for a temporary restraining
order. Doc. #1, Exhibit 1.1
17
The court has reviewed the documents and pleadings on file in this matter and finds that
18
Nunez’s motion for a temporary restraining order is moot. This action was removed to this court on
19
February 7, 2012. See Doc. #1. However, the underlying motion seeks to stop a trustee’s sale that
20
was scheduled to take place on January 4, 2012.
A temporary restraining order only offers prospective relief. See FED . R. CIV . P. 65(b)(2).
21
22
Therefore, there is no prospective sale for this court to enjoin. Accordingly, the court shall deny
23
Nunez’s motion for a temporary restraining order.
24
///
25
26
1
Refers to the court’s docket entry number.
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order
(Doc. #1, Exhibit 1) is DENIED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
DATED this 21st day of February, 2012.
5
6
7
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?