Ritter v. Marshowski et al

Filing 4

ORDERED that the # 3 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted, and P's # 1 Application for leave to proceed IFP is GRANTED. FURTHER ORD the Clerk shall file the Complaint (doc. # 1 -1). FURTHER ORD this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/6/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

*****

9
10
11
12
13

MATTHEW RITTER,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MIKE MARSHOWSKI, et. al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________________ )

3:12-cv-00194-LRH-WGC
O RDER

14
15

Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb

16

(#31 ) entered on April 23, 2012, recommending granting Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma

17

pauperis (#1) filed on April 9, 2012, and dismissing the complaint with prejudice. No objection to the Report

18

and Recommendation has been filed. The action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

19

§ 636(b)(1)B and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the

20

District of Nevada.

21

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the pleadings and

22

memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and

23

Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#3)

24

entered on April 23, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.

25
26

1

Refers to court’s docket number.

1

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#3)

2

entered on April 23, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma

3

pauperis (#1) is GRANTED. The movant herein is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without

4

the necessity of prepayment of fees or costs. However, this order does not extend to the issuance of

5

subpoenas at government expense.

6

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall file the Complaint (doc. #1-1).

7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

DATED this 6th day of July, 2012.

10
11
12
13

_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2