Jansing v. Trans Union, LLC et al

Filing 68

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE on 67 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Edward C. Reed, Jr on 6/21/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4

NATHAN M. JENKINS (560)
JERRY C. CARTER (5905)
JENKINS & CARTER
501 Hammill Lane
Reno, NV 89511
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant FreedomRoad Financial Services

5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8
9

NICHOLAS JANSING,

10

Plaintiff,

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

501 Hammill Lane
Reno, Nevada 89511-1004
[phone] Fax [phone]

JENKINS & CARTER

11

vs.

12

Case No. 3:12-cv-00227-ECR-VPC

TRANS UNION, LLC; EXPERIAN
INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.;
FREEDOMROAD FINANCIAL,

13

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants.

14
15

___________________________________/

16

FREEDOMROAD FINANCIAL
SERVICES, a division of Evergreen Bank
Group, an Illinois Charted Banking
Institution,

17
18
19
20
21
22

Counterclaimant,
vs.
NICHOLAS JANSING,
Counterdefendant.
___________________________________/

23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among the parties to the above-entitled action,

24
25

through their undersigned counsel of record, that all claims and counterclaims in the above-

26

entitled action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

27

41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

28

///
1

1

DATED: June 19, 2012

2

KROHN & MOSS, LTD.

3

By:

4
5

/s/ Douglas S. Baek
Douglas Baek
Attorney for Plaintiff Nicholas Jansing

DATED: June 19, 2012

6

JENKINS & CARTER

7

By:

8

/s/ Jerry C. Carter
Jerry C. Carter
Attorney for Defendant FreedomRoad
Financial Services

9
10

DATED: June 19, 2012

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

501 Hammill Lane
Reno, Nevada 89511-1004
[phone] Fax [phone]

JENKINS & CARTER

11

STRASBURGER & PRICE, LLP

12

By:

13
14

/s/ Allison Reddoch
Allison Reddoch
Attorney for Defendant Trans Union, LLC

DATED: June 19, 2012

15

JONES DAY

16

By:

17

/s/ Michael R. McLively
Michael R. McLively
Attorney for Defendant Experian
Information Solutions, Inc.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing therefor;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action, including all claims and
counterclaims filed therein, shall be, and the same hereby is, dismissed with prejudice pursuant to
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own costs and
attorneys’ fees.
June
21st
DATED this __________ day of ____________________, 2012.

26
27
28

_______________________________________
DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
2