Hooks v. Rose
Filing
4
ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint in a new action. FURTHER ORD that the Clerk of the Court shall send P 2 1983 forms, and 2 IFP forms, with instructions. ( Mailed 5/17/2012.) FURTHER ORD P may f ile a new complaint and IFP application in a new action, but he may not file further documents in this action. FURTHER ORD the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 5/16/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
JERRY HOOKS,
9
Plaintiff,
vs.
10
CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
3:12-cv-00246-LRH-WGC
ORDER
This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a state
13
14
prisoner. Neither a filing fee nor an application to proceed in forma pauperis was submitted with the
15
complaint. Plaintiff must either submit the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma
16
pauperis when initiating an action in this Court.
17
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to the
18
filing of a new complaint in a new action. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
19
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff two copies of
20
an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner, one copy of the instructions for same, two
21
copies of a blank 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner civil rights form, and one copy of instructions for the
22
same.
23
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff may file a new complaint and in forma pauperis
application in a new action, but he may not file further documents in this action.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
26
Dated this 16th day of May, 2012.
27
28
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?