Countryman v. Access SeewePak Keefe Commissary/Network, LLC
Filing
13
ORDER adopting and accepting 9 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's complaint 1 -1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/28/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
9
10
11
12
13
14
RALPH COUNTRYMAN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ACCESS SECUREPAK KEEFE
)
COMMISSARY/NETWORK, LLC,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_____________________________________ )
3:12-cv-00253-LRH-VPC
ORDER
15
Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge Valerie P.
16
Cooke (#91) entered on November 2, 2012, recommending dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint (#1-1) with
17
prejudice. Plaintiff filed his Opposition to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#12) on
18
December 5, 2012. This matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)
19
and Local Rule 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of
20
Nevada.
21
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
22
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
23
to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate
24
Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#9) entered on November 2, 2012, should be adopted and
25
26
1
Refers to court’s docket number.
1
accepted.
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (#9)
3
entered on November 2, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff’s complaint (#1-1) is
4
DISMISSED with prejudice.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED this 28th day of January, 2013.
7
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?