Hydro Tech, Inc. v. Ames Construction, Inc.

Filing 21

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice per 20 Stipulation. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
Case 3:12-cv-00262-LRH-WGC Document 20 Filed 11/15/13 Page 1 of 3 Patrick R. Millsap 1 Nevada Bar No. 12043 2 FAHRENDORF, VILORIA, OLIPHANT & OSTER L.L.P. 3 P.O. Box 3677 Reno, Nevada 89505 4 (775) 348-9999 pmillsap@renonvlaw.com 5 Attorney for Hydro Tech, Inc. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 HYDRO TECH, INC. Case No: 3:12-cv-00262-LHR-WG Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AMES CONSTRUCTION, INC. 13 Defendant. 14 ______________________________________/ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by the parties herein, by and through their respective 15 16 counsel, to the dismissal of the above-referenced matter with prejudice, with each party to bear their 17 own attorneys fees and costs. 18 DATED: 19 20 FAHRENDORF, VILORIA, OLIPHANT & OSTER L.L.P. 21 By: 22 23 24 11/15/13 /s/ Patrick R. Millsap Patrick R. Millsap Nevada Bar No. 12043 P.O. Box 3677 Reno, Nevada 89505 (775) 348-9999 Attorney for Plaintiff DATED: 11/15/13 SUITTER AXLAND, PLLC By: 25 26 27 28 522679 -1- /s/ Noah Hoagland Carl F. Huefner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 255 Michael W. Homer, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice Noah M. Hoagland, Esq. Admitted Pro Hac Vice 8 East Broadway, Suite 200 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Attorneys for Defendant Case 3:12-cv-00262-LRH-WGC Document 20 Filed 11/15/13 Page 2 of 3 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-referenced matter is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear their own attorneys fees and costs 3 DATED this 18thday of November, 2013. , 2013. day of 4 5 DISTRICT JUDGE 6 ________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 522679 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?