Atkins v. Williams, Sr. et al
Filing
26
ORDER - Karlon J. Kidder's 21 motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to so indicate. The Clerk SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to reflect that plaintiff's address of reco rd is P.O. Box 2282, Reno, Nevada 89505. The Clerk of Court SHALL SERVE this order and a copy of the current CM/ECF docket sheet for this action on plaintiff at his last known address, along with a blank form for filing a § 1983 complaint and i nstructions, and a copy of plaintiff's 5 first amended complaint (mailed 8/21/2013). Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff SHALL secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance, or in the altern ative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per. Within 45 days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a second amended complaint. (Notice of Compliance is due by 9/20/2013; Amended Complaint deadline: 10/5/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 08/21/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) Modified on 8/21/2013 to indicate mailing to plaintiff (KR).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
JAMES ATKINS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al.,
14
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
/
3:12-cv-00288-MMD-WGC
ORDER
15
16
This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A status conference in this
17
matter was held on August 21, 2013. Before the Court is counsel’s motion to withdraw as plaintiff’s
18
attorney of record and other matters relevant to the status of this action.
19
This action has been pending for over one year. By order filed September 26, 2012, the
20
Court entered a screening order directing plaintiff to conduct limited discovery to ascertain the
21
identity of John Doe defendant #1, as referenced in the amended complaint, and then to file a second
22
amended complaint naming that defendant. (ECF No. 6). The Court’s screening order directed the
23
Nevada Attorney General to make a limited notice of appearance for the purpose of responding to
24
plaintiff’s interrogatories regarding the identity of the Doe defendant. (Id.). On October 5, 2012,
25
Deputy Attorney General Steven D. Quinn entered a limited notice of appearance on behalf of
26
defendants. (ECF No. 8).
1
Instead of complying with this Court’s order, plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of
2
counsel (ECF No. 10) and a notice of appeal (ECF No. 9) of the Court’s screening order of
3
September 26, 2012. On November 9, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the
4
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 12).
5
By order filed January 28, 2013, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of
6
counsel. (ECF No. 15). In that order, the Court again directed plaintiff to serve limited discovery
7
requests on defendants in accordance with the Court’s screening order, within thirty days of the entry
8
of the order. (Id.). The Court further directed plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within
9
thirty days of the date he was served with defendants’ responses to interrogatories regarding the
10
identities of any Doe defendants. (Id.). Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order.
11
On April 3, 2013, attorney Karlon J. Kidder filed a notice of appearance on behalf of
12
plaintiff. (ECF No. 16). On July 30, 2013, the Court directed plaintiff to file a status report
13
apprising the Court of the status of this action, and in particular, whether any interrogatories had
14
been served and whether any responses had been received from defendants to ascertain the identity
15
of Doe defendants. (ECF No. 17). A status conference was set on the undersigned’s calendar for
16
August 21, 2013. (ECF No. 19).
17
Plaintiff’s counsel filed a status report on August 12, 2013, indicating that he had made
18
contact with counsel for defendants. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff’s counsel indicates that two persons
19
were named as possible John Doe #1 in the amended complaint. Counsel, however, further indicates
20
that he has been unable to contact plaintiff to confirm the name of the defendant and to proceed with
21
the filing of the second amended complaint. Counsel advises the Court that his last contact with
22
plaintiff was approximately April 15, 2013, and that numerous attempts to contact plaintiff were
23
made via phone and mail, but all attempts have failed. At the status hearing, counsel advised the
24
Court that, in his written communication to plaintiff, he has advised plaintiff of the possible
25
identities of the Doe defendants.
26
Concurrent with the filing of the status report, plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw
2
1
as plaintiff’s attorney of record. (ECF No. 21). Counsel states that irreconcilable differences
2
between him and plaintiff have arisen, specifically, plaintiff’s failure to communicate with counsel,
3
failure to cooperate with counsel, and failure to follow counsel’s legal advice. No attorney may
4
withdraw after appearing in a case except by leave of Court after notice has been served on the
5
affected client and opposing counsel. Local Rules of Civil Practice, LR IA 10-6(b). Counsel for
6
plaintiff properly served his motion to withdraw on plaintiff at his last known address, and on
7
opposing counsel. In light of counsel’s motion to withdraw, the Court directed plaintiff to personally
8
appear at the status conference held on August 21, 2013. (ECF No. 22). Although counsel for both
9
parties appeared telephonically at the status conference, plaintiff did not appear. Plaintiff filed no
10
response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel having complied with Local Rule 10-6(b) and
11
good cause appearing, based counsel’s representations in his motion, status report, and at the status
12
conference, the motion to withdraw as plaintiff’s attorney of record is granted.
13
The Clerk of Court shall serve plaintiff, at his last known address, with this order and with a
14
current printout of the CM/ECF docket sheet in this action. Within thirty days from the date of entry
15
of this order, plaintiff shall secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance; or
16
in the alternative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per. Within forty-five
17
days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint, naming any
18
and all Doe defendants referred to in the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to
19
comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of
20
prosecution.
21
22
23
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Karlon J. Kidder’s motion to withdraw as counsel of
record for plaintiff (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF
24
docket to indicate that Karlon J. Kidder’s representation of plaintiff is terminated. The Clerk
25
SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to reflect that plaintiff’s address of record is P.O. Box 2282,
26
Reno, Nevada 89505.
3
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SERVE this order and a
2
copy of the current CM/ECF docket sheet for this action on plaintiff at his last known address,
3
P.O. Box 2282, Reno, Nevada 89505.
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND to plaintiff the court-
5
approved blank form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of
6
plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff shall use the court-approved complaint
7
form and he shall write the words “Second Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in
8
the caption on page 1 of the complaint form. The second amended complaint must be a complete
9
document in and of itself, and it will supercede the first amended complaint in its entirety.
10
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this
11
order, plaintiff SHALL secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance, or in
12
the alternative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within forty-five days (45) days from the date of entry
14
of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a second amended complaint, naming any and all Doe
15
defendants referred to in the amended complaint.
16
17
18
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s failure to comply with all directives in this
order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Dated this 21st day of August, 2013.
19
20
21
WILLIAM G. COBB
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?