Atkins v. Williams, Sr. et al

Filing 26

ORDER - Karlon J. Kidder's 21 motion to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to so indicate. The Clerk SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to reflect that plaintiff's address of reco rd is P.O. Box 2282, Reno, Nevada 89505. The Clerk of Court SHALL SERVE this order and a copy of the current CM/ECF docket sheet for this action on plaintiff at his last known address, along with a blank form for filing a § 1983 complaint and i nstructions, and a copy of plaintiff's 5 first amended complaint (mailed 8/21/2013). Within 30 days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff SHALL secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance, or in the altern ative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per. Within 45 days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a second amended complaint. (Notice of Compliance is due by 9/20/2013; Amended Complaint deadline: 10/5/2013.) Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 08/21/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR) Modified on 8/21/2013 to indicate mailing to plaintiff (KR).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JAMES ATKINS, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, SR., et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 3:12-cv-00288-MMD-WGC ORDER 15 16 This is a civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. A status conference in this 17 matter was held on August 21, 2013. Before the Court is counsel’s motion to withdraw as plaintiff’s 18 attorney of record and other matters relevant to the status of this action. 19 This action has been pending for over one year. By order filed September 26, 2012, the 20 Court entered a screening order directing plaintiff to conduct limited discovery to ascertain the 21 identity of John Doe defendant #1, as referenced in the amended complaint, and then to file a second 22 amended complaint naming that defendant. (ECF No. 6). The Court’s screening order directed the 23 Nevada Attorney General to make a limited notice of appearance for the purpose of responding to 24 plaintiff’s interrogatories regarding the identity of the Doe defendant. (Id.). On October 5, 2012, 25 Deputy Attorney General Steven D. Quinn entered a limited notice of appearance on behalf of 26 defendants. (ECF No. 8). 1 Instead of complying with this Court’s order, plaintiff filed a motion for the appointment of 2 counsel (ECF No. 10) and a notice of appeal (ECF No. 9) of the Court’s screening order of 3 September 26, 2012. On November 9, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the 4 appeal for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 12). 5 By order filed January 28, 2013, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of 6 counsel. (ECF No. 15). In that order, the Court again directed plaintiff to serve limited discovery 7 requests on defendants in accordance with the Court’s screening order, within thirty days of the entry 8 of the order. (Id.). The Court further directed plaintiff to file a second amended complaint within 9 thirty days of the date he was served with defendants’ responses to interrogatories regarding the 10 identities of any Doe defendants. (Id.). Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s order. 11 On April 3, 2013, attorney Karlon J. Kidder filed a notice of appearance on behalf of 12 plaintiff. (ECF No. 16). On July 30, 2013, the Court directed plaintiff to file a status report 13 apprising the Court of the status of this action, and in particular, whether any interrogatories had 14 been served and whether any responses had been received from defendants to ascertain the identity 15 of Doe defendants. (ECF No. 17). A status conference was set on the undersigned’s calendar for 16 August 21, 2013. (ECF No. 19). 17 Plaintiff’s counsel filed a status report on August 12, 2013, indicating that he had made 18 contact with counsel for defendants. (ECF No. 20). Plaintiff’s counsel indicates that two persons 19 were named as possible John Doe #1 in the amended complaint. Counsel, however, further indicates 20 that he has been unable to contact plaintiff to confirm the name of the defendant and to proceed with 21 the filing of the second amended complaint. Counsel advises the Court that his last contact with 22 plaintiff was approximately April 15, 2013, and that numerous attempts to contact plaintiff were 23 made via phone and mail, but all attempts have failed. At the status hearing, counsel advised the 24 Court that, in his written communication to plaintiff, he has advised plaintiff of the possible 25 identities of the Doe defendants. 26 Concurrent with the filing of the status report, plaintiff’s counsel filed a motion to withdraw 2 1 as plaintiff’s attorney of record. (ECF No. 21). Counsel states that irreconcilable differences 2 between him and plaintiff have arisen, specifically, plaintiff’s failure to communicate with counsel, 3 failure to cooperate with counsel, and failure to follow counsel’s legal advice. No attorney may 4 withdraw after appearing in a case except by leave of Court after notice has been served on the 5 affected client and opposing counsel. Local Rules of Civil Practice, LR IA 10-6(b). Counsel for 6 plaintiff properly served his motion to withdraw on plaintiff at his last known address, and on 7 opposing counsel. In light of counsel’s motion to withdraw, the Court directed plaintiff to personally 8 appear at the status conference held on August 21, 2013. (ECF No. 22). Although counsel for both 9 parties appeared telephonically at the status conference, plaintiff did not appear. Plaintiff filed no 10 response to counsel’s motion to withdraw. Counsel having complied with Local Rule 10-6(b) and 11 good cause appearing, based counsel’s representations in his motion, status report, and at the status 12 conference, the motion to withdraw as plaintiff’s attorney of record is granted. 13 The Clerk of Court shall serve plaintiff, at his last known address, with this order and with a 14 current printout of the CM/ECF docket sheet in this action. Within thirty days from the date of entry 15 of this order, plaintiff shall secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance; or 16 in the alternative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per. Within forty-five 17 days from the date of entry of this order, plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint, naming any 18 and all Doe defendants referred to in the amended complaint. Plaintiff is cautioned that his failure to 19 comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of 20 prosecution. 21 22 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Karlon J. Kidder’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF 24 docket to indicate that Karlon J. Kidder’s representation of plaintiff is terminated. The Clerk 25 SHALL UPDATE the CM/ECF docket to reflect that plaintiff’s address of record is P.O. Box 2282, 26 Reno, Nevada 89505. 3 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL SERVE this order and a 2 copy of the current CM/ECF docket sheet for this action on plaintiff at his last known address, 3 P.O. Box 2282, Reno, Nevada 89505. 4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court SHALL SEND to plaintiff the court- 5 approved blank form for filing a § 1983 complaint, instructions for the same, and a copy of 6 plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff shall use the court-approved complaint 7 form and he shall write the words “Second Amended” above the words “Civil Rights Complaint” in 8 the caption on page 1 of the complaint form. The second amended complaint must be a complete 9 document in and of itself, and it will supercede the first amended complaint in its entirety. 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this 11 order, plaintiff SHALL secure alternate counsel and counsel shall file a notice of appearance, or in 12 the alternative, plaintiff shall notify the Court that he is proceeding in pro per. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within forty-five days (45) days from the date of entry 14 of this order, plaintiff SHALL FILE a second amended complaint, naming any and all Doe 15 defendants referred to in the amended complaint. 16 17 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s failure to comply with all directives in this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Dated this 21st day of August, 2013. 19 20 21 WILLIAM G. COBB UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?