Townley et al vs State of Nevada, et al
Filing
64
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for lack of standing. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 09/16/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
WENDY TOWNLEY, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROSS MILLER, Secretary of State of
)
Nevada,
)
)
Defendant,
)
)
and
)
)
KINGSLEY EDWARDS,
)
)
Intervenor-Defendant.
)
)
___________________________________ )
3:12-cv-310-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
17
Currently before the Court is the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion
18
reversing and remanding a prior decision of this Court.
19
BACKGROUND
20
In June 2012, Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint for injunctive and declaratory relief
21
in this Court seeking to enjoin Defendant Nevada Secretary of State Ross Miller, his agents,
22
employees, affiliates, and all those acting in concert with him from allowing “None of these
23
candidates” to appear on any paper, mechanical, or electronic ballots, voting machines, or
24
other voting systems, in any future elections, including the November 6, 2012 general election.
25
(Am. Compl. (#10) at 1, 16). Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction. (Mot. for Prelim.
26
Injunction (#15)).
27
On August 22, 2012, this Court held a hearing and stated that it intended to grant
28
Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and that it would issue a written ruling. (Minutes
1
of Proceedings (#39)). Defendants filed notices of appeal on August 24th and 25th, 2012.
2
(Notices of Appeal (#40, 41)). Sometime after Defendants had filed their notices of appeal but
3
prior to August 30, 2013, Judge Stephen Reinhardt of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth
4
Circuit contacted this chambers through the Ninth Circuit Clerk’s Office and requested that this
5
Court enter an early entry of its written injunction decision so that Judge Reinhardt could
6
entertain the premature notice of appeal and emergency motion for stay pending appeal. (See
7
Order Setting Date (#47) at 1-2). In response, on August 30, 2012, this Court ordered the
8
parties to file briefs regarding the motion to stay pending appeal on or before Friday,
9
September 7, 2012 and scheduled a hearing for Friday, September 14, 2012. (Id. at 2).
10
Subsequently, on September 5, 2012, the Ninth Circuit issued an amended order which
11
stated that it had jurisdiction over those appeals. (Ninth Cir. Order (#52) at 3). The Ninth
12
Circuit interpreted this Court’s August 22, 2012 minutes of the proceedings as this Court’s
13
preliminary injunction order and took jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
14
§ 1292(a)(1). (Id. at 2-3). As a result, this Court issued an order denying as moot Defendants’
15
Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and Emergency Motion for Clarification or
16
Modification of Order, or in the Alternative, to Enter a Written Order. (Order Denying as Moot
17
(#51) at 1).
18
On appeal, the Ninth Circuit did not reach the merits of this case. (Ninth Cir. Op. (#60)
19
at 5). The Ninth Circuit stated that it would not resolve the merits of the case because “none
20
of these plaintiffs has standing to assert the claims made in this lawsuit.” (Id.). After analyzing
21
why the plaintiffs lacked standing, the Ninth Circuit “vacate[d] the preliminary injunction and
22
remand[ed] with instructions that the district court dismiss this action without prejudice for lack
23
of standing.” (Id. at 17).
Pursuant to the remand, the Court now dismisses this action without prejudice for lack
24
25
of standing.
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
CONCLUSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without
prejudice for lack of standing.
The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
Dated this 16th day of September, 2013.
DATED: This _____ day of August, 2013.
7
8
_________________________________
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?